From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Miles Bader Subject: Re: [PATCH] Rework strbuf API and semantics. Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2007 13:44:04 +0900 Message-ID: References: <11888956802504-git-send-email-madcoder@debian.org> <20070904115317.GA3381@artemis.corp> Reply-To: Miles Bader Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Sep 05 06:44:09 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ISmkJ-00060X-Tx for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Wed, 05 Sep 2007 06:44:08 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752942AbXIEEoC (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Sep 2007 00:44:02 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752791AbXIEEoB (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Sep 2007 00:44:01 -0400 Received: from TYO202.gate.nec.co.jp ([202.32.8.206]:64918 "EHLO tyo202.gate.nec.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752518AbXIEEoA (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Sep 2007 00:44:00 -0400 Received: from relay31.aps.necel.com ([10.29.19.54]) by tyo202.gate.nec.co.jp (8.13.8/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l854hA1n028295; Wed, 5 Sep 2007 13:43:52 +0900 (JST) Received: from relay31.aps.necel.com ([10.29.19.24] [10.29.19.24]) by relay31.aps.necel.com with ESMTP; Wed, 5 Sep 2007 13:43:52 +0900 Received: from dhapc248.dev.necel.com ([10.114.98.116] [10.114.98.116]) by relay31.aps.necel.com with ESMTP; Wed, 5 Sep 2007 13:43:52 +0900 Received: by dhapc248.dev.necel.com (Postfix, from userid 31295) id E583E58A; Wed, 5 Sep 2007 13:44:05 +0900 (JST) System-Type: i686-pc-linux-gnu Blat: Foop In-Reply-To: <20070904115317.GA3381@artemis.corp> (Pierre Habouzit's message of "Tue\, 04 Sep 2007 13\:53\:17 +0200") Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Pierre Habouzit writes: > In my own coding rules, I have _new/_delete and _init/_wipe functions, > the former acts on pointers, the latter on the structs. Hence the > naming. A little off-topic, but my own personal convention for the latter case are _init/_fini -- I've always thought the "fini" name was a pretty good partner for "init", so I share it here... :-) -Miles -- o The existentialist, not having a pillow, goes everywhere with the book by Sullivan, _I am going to spit on your graves_.