From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Miles Bader Subject: Re: [GSoC update] Sequencer for inclusion Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 15:28:34 +0900 Message-ID: References: <1310396048-24925-1-git-send-email-artagnon@gmail.com> <20110711171713.GA5963@elie> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: Ramkumar Ramachandra , Git List , Junio C Hamano , Christian Couder , Daniel Barkalow To: Jonathan Nieder X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Jul 12 08:28:42 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QgWSY-0001Oq-2x for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 08:28:42 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753468Ab1GLG2i (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Jul 2011 02:28:38 -0400 Received: from relmlor1.renesas.com ([210.160.252.171]:62242 "EHLO relmlor1.renesas.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751367Ab1GLG2h (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Jul 2011 02:28:37 -0400 Received: from relmlir2.idc.renesas.com ([10.200.68.152]) by relmlor1.idc.renesas.com ( SJSMS) with ESMTP id <0LO7000WYJBN0M60@relmlor1.idc.renesas.com> for git@vger.kernel.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 15:28:35 +0900 (JST) Received: from relmlac1.idc.renesas.com ([10.200.69.21]) by relmlir2.idc.renesas.com ( SJSMS) with ESMTP id <0LO7007UHJBNESC0@relmlir2.idc.renesas.com> for git@vger.kernel.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 15:28:35 +0900 (JST) Received: by relmlac1.idc.renesas.com (Postfix, from userid 0) id ABF2E80088; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 15:28:35 +0900 (JST) Received: from relmlac1.idc.renesas.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relmlac1.idc.renesas.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4B6380086; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 15:28:35 +0900 (JST) Received: from relmlii1.idc.renesas.com [10.200.68.65] by relmlac1.idc.renesas.com with ESMTP id RAC05643; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 15:28:35 +0900 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.65,519,1304262000"; d="scan'208";a="36363571" Received: from unknown (HELO relay31.aps.necel.com) ([10.29.19.54]) by relmlii1.idc.renesas.com with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 15:28:35 +0900 Received: from relay31.aps.necel.com ([10.29.19.54] [10.29.19.54]) by relay31.aps.necel.com with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 15:28:35 +0900 Received: from dhlpc061 ([10.114.97.129] [10.114.97.129]) by relay31.aps.necel.com with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 15:28:35 +0900 Received: by dhlpc061 (Postfix, from userid 31295) id E565B52E22E; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 15:28:34 +0900 (JST) System-Type: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Blat: Foop In-reply-to: <20110711171713.GA5963@elie> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jonathan Nieder writes: > To be precise, the format used includes > > strategy-option = patience | renormalize > > to represent the effect of "-Xpatience -Xrenormalize". My only worry > about that is that the "|" can sound like "or", which would seem > strange to a user that does not necessarily develop software (so is > not thinking about bitfields). How about using "+" instead of "|"...? I think that would make sense both for bitfield-thinking and non-bitfield-thinking readers ... :] -Miles -- Occam's razor split hairs so well, I bought the whole argument!