From: "Sverre Rabbelier" <alturin@gmail.com>
To: "Miklos Vajna" <vmiklos@frugalware.org>
Cc: "Git Mailinglist" <git@vger.kernel.org>,
"Johannes Schindelin" <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: theirs/ours was Re: [PATCH 6/6] Add a new test for using a custom merge strategy
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 21:48:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bd6139dc0807281248m51997c58q5a7aaf3ac51ee7a@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080728181424.GM32057@genesis.frugalware.org>
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 20:14, Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@frugalware.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 04:54:17PM +0200, Sverre Rabbelier <alturin@gmail.com> wrote:
>> So, in short: what does the list think about adding
>> "git-merge-theirs", that does (although possibly less 'hackish'):
>>
>> cat > git-merge-theirs << EOF
>> #!/bin/sh
>> eval git read-tree --reset -u \\\$\$#
>> EOF
>
> Isn't this the stupid one?
No, the stupid one did "take all non-conflicting hunks from our side,
and any for conflicting hunks, take theirs", which was rather silly I
must say, although I have heard one use-cases where it makes sense (no
I don't think we should have a git-merge-theirs-on-conflict).
> It's perfect for my testing needs, but this is not something that people
> should ever use on a real repo.
What about the use-case I described in my first mail?
--
Cheers,
Sverre Rabbelier
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-28 19:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-28 14:54 theirs/ours was Re: [PATCH 6/6] Add a new test for using a custom merge strategy Sverre Rabbelier
2008-07-28 18:14 ` Miklos Vajna
2008-07-28 19:48 ` Sverre Rabbelier [this message]
2008-07-28 18:56 ` Jeff King
2008-07-28 19:09 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-07-28 19:26 ` Jeff King
2008-07-28 20:00 ` Avery Pennarun
2008-07-28 23:27 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-07-29 0:09 ` Sverre Rabbelier
2008-07-29 4:31 ` Jeff King
2008-07-29 4:38 ` Jeff King
2008-07-29 11:05 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-07-29 12:36 ` Jeff King
2008-07-29 12:42 ` Sverre Rabbelier
2008-07-29 0:37 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-07-29 5:02 ` Jeff King
2008-07-29 9:36 ` Mike Ralphson
2008-07-29 12:42 ` Jeff King
2008-07-28 19:52 ` Sverre Rabbelier
2008-07-28 20:07 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-07-28 20:10 ` Sverre Rabbelier
2008-07-28 20:20 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-07-28 20:24 ` Sverre Rabbelier
2008-07-28 21:16 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-07-28 21:35 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-07-28 21:39 ` Sverre Rabbelier
2008-07-29 5:08 ` Jeff King
2008-07-29 6:35 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bd6139dc0807281248m51997c58q5a7aaf3ac51ee7a@mail.gmail.com \
--to=alturin@gmail.com \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sverre@rabbelier.nl \
--cc=vmiklos@frugalware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).