git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Ben Peart <peartben@gmail.com>
To: "Duy Nguyen" <pclouds@gmail.com>,
	"Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <avarab@gmail.com>
Cc: git <git@vger.kernel.org>, Ben Peart <benpeart@microsoft.com>,
	Alex Vandiver <alexmv@dropbox.com>,
	Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com>,
	jamill@microsoft.com
Subject: Re: Some rough edges of core.fsmonitor
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2018 18:16:23 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bb8a433f-bd61-1f3c-2034-1acc96539882@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180129094033.GA8670@ash>



On 1/29/2018 4:40 AM, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 12:43:41PM +0100, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
>> b) with fsmonitor
>>
>>      $ time GIT_TRACE_PERFORMANCE=1 ~/g/git/git-status
>>      12:34:23.833625 read-cache.c:1890       performance: 0.049485685 s: read cache .git/index
> 
> This is sort of off topic but may be interesting for big repo guys. It
> looks like read cache's time is partially dominated by malloc().
> 

That is correct.  We have tried a few different ways to address this. 
First was my patch series [1] that would parallelize all of the read 
cache code.

We quickly found that malloc() was the biggest culprit and by speeding 
that up, we got most of the wins.  At Peff's recommendation [2], we 
looked into using tcmalloc but found that 1) it has bugs on Windows and 
2) it isn't being actively maintained so it didn't seem those bugs would 
ever get fixed.

We are currently working on a patch that will use a refactored version 
of the mem_pool in fast-import.c to do block allocations of the cache 
entries which is giving us about a 22% improvement in "git status" 
times.  One challenge has been ensuring that cache entries are not 
passed from one index/mem_pool to another which could cause access after 
free bugs.

[1] 
https://public-inbox.org/git/20171109141737.47976-1-benpeart@microsoft.com/
[2] 
https://public-inbox.org/git/20171120153846.v5b7ho42yzrznqoh@sigill.intra.peff.net/


> This is the performance breakdown of do_read_index()
> 
> $ GIT_TRACE_PERFORMANCE=2 ~/w/git/t/helper/test-read-cache
> 0.000078489 s: open/mmap/close
> 0.038915239 s: main entries
> 0.018983150 s: ext TREE
> 0.012667080 s: ext UNTR
> 0.000005372 s: ext FSMN
> 0.001473470 s: munmap
> 0.072386911 s: read cache .git/index
> 
> Reading main index entries takes like half of the time (0.038 vs
> 0.072). With the below patch to take out hundred thousands of malloc()
> we have this, loading main entries now only takes 0.012s:
> 
> $ GIT_TRACE_PERFORMANCE=2 ~/w/git/t/helper/test-read-cache
> 0.000046587 s: open/mmap/close
> 0.012077300 s: main entries
> 0.020477683 s: ext TREE
> 0.010259998 s: ext UNTR
> 0.000010250 s: ext FSMN
> 0.000753854 s: munmap
> 0.043906473 s: read cache .git/index
> 
> We used to do less malloc until debed2a629 (read-cache.c: allocate
> index entries individually - 2011-10-24) but I don't think we can
> simply revert that (not worth the extra complexity of the old way).
> 
> Now "TREE" and "UNTR" extensions become a bigger problem.
> 
> -- 8< --
> diff --git a/read-cache.c b/read-cache.c
> index d60e0a8480..88f4213c99 100644
> --- a/read-cache.c
> +++ b/read-cache.c
> @@ -1622,7 +1622,12 @@ static struct cache_entry *cache_entry_from_ondisk(struct ondisk_cache_entry *on
>   						   const char *name,
>   						   size_t len)
>   {
> +#if 0
>   	struct cache_entry *ce = xmalloc(cache_entry_size(len));
> +#else
> +	static char buf[1024];
> +	struct cache_entry *ce = (struct cache_entry *)buf;
> +#endif
>   
>   	ce->ce_stat_data.sd_ctime.sec = get_be32(&ondisk->ctime.sec);
>   	ce->ce_stat_data.sd_mtime.sec = get_be32(&ondisk->mtime.sec);
> diff --git a/t/helper/test-read-cache.c b/t/helper/test-read-cache.c
> index 48255eef31..e1d21d17a3 100644
> --- a/t/helper/test-read-cache.c
> +++ b/t/helper/test-read-cache.c
> @@ -8,7 +8,9 @@ int cmd_main(int argc, const char **argv)
>   	setup_git_directory();
>   	for (i = 0; i < cnt; i++) {
>   		read_cache();
> +#if 0
>   		discard_cache();
> +#endif
>   	}
>   	return 0;
>   }
> -- 8< --
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2018-01-29 23:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-01-27  0:28 Some rough edges of core.fsmonitor Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2018-01-27  1:36 ` Duy Nguyen
2018-01-27  1:39   ` [PATCH] trace: measure where the time is spent in the index-heavy operations Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2018-01-27 11:58     ` Thomas Gummerer
2018-01-27 12:27       ` [PATCH v2] " Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2018-01-27 11:43   ` Some rough edges of core.fsmonitor Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2018-01-27 12:39     ` Duy Nguyen
2018-01-27 13:09       ` Duy Nguyen
2018-01-27 19:01         ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2018-01-30 22:41           ` Ben Peart
2018-01-29  9:40     ` Duy Nguyen
2018-01-29 23:16       ` Ben Peart [this message]
2018-02-01 10:40         ` Duy Nguyen
2018-01-28 20:44 ` Johannes Schindelin
2018-01-28 22:28   ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2018-01-30  1:21     ` Ben Peart
2018-01-31 10:15       ` Duy Nguyen
2018-02-04  9:38         ` [PATCH] dir.c: ignore paths containing .git when invalidating untracked cache Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2018-02-05 17:44           ` Ben Peart
2018-02-06 12:02             ` Duy Nguyen
2018-02-07  9:21           ` [PATCH v2] " Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2018-02-07  9:21             ` Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2018-02-07 16:59               ` Ben Peart
2018-02-13 10:00                 ` Duy Nguyen
2018-02-13 17:57                   ` Junio C Hamano
2018-02-14  1:24                     ` Duy Nguyen
2018-02-14  8:00                       ` Junio C Hamano
2018-01-30 22:57 ` Some rough edges of core.fsmonitor Ben Peart
2018-01-30 23:16   ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2018-01-31 16:12     ` Ben Peart

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bb8a433f-bd61-1f3c-2034-1acc96539882@gmail.com \
    --to=peartben@gmail.com \
    --cc=alexmv@dropbox.com \
    --cc=avarab@gmail.com \
    --cc=benpeart@microsoft.com \
    --cc=christian.couder@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jamill@microsoft.com \
    --cc=pclouds@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).