From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E14E201C8 for ; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 16:59:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933148AbdKOQ7q (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Nov 2017 11:59:46 -0500 Received: from mail-pf0-f174.google.com ([209.85.192.174]:47046 "EHLO mail-pf0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932406AbdKOQ7p (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Nov 2017 11:59:45 -0500 Received: by mail-pf0-f174.google.com with SMTP id i15so7112601pfa.3 for ; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 08:59:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=MMIDOguf41GUU3v8WF0gae3sAnP6dk3DwlphUfv1Z3M=; b=oaJu53CXriw5M0Jggt6PGLTKfXBNprWsAgWEbqcrgjSTf8wo3GpxRj8EeSYscOfeGW GlslhiRUgfsweJZeRLOokOZT2bh8F9wBDk1jXxHmRki9QaSr78PXEOnDNDgc8FSUEeUG CTRCkEKE5d5ZTI3B+yEbIKPvypXd/HES9Nintney34XeDURjYuo1qNnVjmH52iIWs347 4xA1J1ieD6CrAIK2E9tcoZOwtASlFlfHq30yZYLY2hugX3RxvRuaXfk9GEsNp2aK7RDu 3d+UbSl2d6fQNTxpFItXQbeIm/7L7CJQhGIVdvUuy8at+0rONiZ8gKEgrpDypcLAdPis 06Yg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=MMIDOguf41GUU3v8WF0gae3sAnP6dk3DwlphUfv1Z3M=; b=ffNgZDlv60+0rOeM+VzUGARqf8g4SyTLEixX5NuBblK9PrcSNS9YSxrlC1FYpeeVhQ nuuXEDheR8MRcnmjF1k6mj5zfHqYZF2fnVYgmbXXOTqZgTT0W5uoA27WdCiizxlKA1yk wfa2ekRPg1y20vuAUtOSODmUE7C3mtE+zqcYTynvF2fEVVLMHdymhWJjlLBFneV2M5Lp 6V8j6TvQMkZ58vqjkr6ME/uNZqP3hetMjyfOPkgRDFLz1wbdGxF9OkUZB3KDYEVOJVbS 0nbA6r/GMfHWTryZq+rrjY6b7ejbQO5srm6knN8HcEfRGPtRZsl6Hz/E2FlCfGDkBZu3 ApKg== X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX6zjOA+rTQCri8kzGsdmNdlQyRLiFLLWJ1qwoT+Sl47kscaulul WzmwavNR8SbMIiVJiQGkOFZX+wHz X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMbEg4TmJHEqKmbpcXPoryp2WOoeMW9YRSOibg1Feo+Iq57vT9MoglGkxDBBnYJzjs+jJjZnCw== X-Received: by 10.98.32.21 with SMTP id g21mr11895355pfg.52.1510765184409; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 08:59:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPv6:2405:204:72c0:fc36:9c82:85fe:4ccc:5d56? ([2405:204:72c0:fc36:9c82:85fe:4ccc:5d56]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t4sm18536732pfd.110.2017.11.15.08.59.41 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 15 Nov 2017 08:59:43 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] branch: forbid refs/heads/HEAD To: Junio C Hamano Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Jeff King References: <20171013051132.3973-1-gitster@pobox.com> <20171114114259.8937-1-kaartic.sivaraam@gmail.com> <0f8166ab-7955-aa78-7d32-0ec80944f007@gmail.com> From: Kaartic Sivaraam Message-ID: Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 22:29:38 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 14 November 2017 08:38 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Kaartic Sivaraam writes: > >> I should have been a little more clear with the numbering, sorry. The >> correct prefix should have been as follows, >> >> * [PATCH v2 1/2] --> [PATCH v2 3/3] >> >> * [PATCH v2 1/2] --> [PATCH v2 4/3] >> >> Sorry for the inconvenience. > > I assume that the second one above actually talks about what was > sent as "v2 2/2" (not "v2 1/2") being "4/3"? > Yeah. Copy paste error, sorry. > Are these two patches follow-up fixes (replacement of 3/3 plus an > extra patch) to jc/branch-name-sanity topic? > Yes, that's right. > Thanks for working on these. > You're welcome. Please do be sure I haven't broken anything in v2. These patches should cleanly apply on 'next', if they don't let me know. Thanks, Kaartic