From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.6 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5772B203E2 for ; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 20:55:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S936515AbcKKUzB (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Nov 2016 15:55:01 -0500 Received: from bsmtp.bon.at ([213.33.87.14]:58696 "EHLO bsmtp.bon.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756014AbcKKUzA (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Nov 2016 15:55:00 -0500 Received: from dx.site (unknown [93.83.142.38]) by bsmtp.bon.at (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3tFscL2mWsz5tlC; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 21:54:58 +0100 (CET) Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by dx.site (Postfix) with ESMTP id F28E3145; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 21:54:57 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] t6026: ensure that long-running script really is To: Junio C Hamano References: <16dc9f159b214997f7501006a8d1d8be2ef858e8.1478699463.git.johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> <20161111084148.tgtsijn74z2pdylq@sigill.intra.peff.net> <6a421222-a138-5647-4965-8ede24d904b2@kdbg.org> Cc: Jeff King , Johannes Schindelin , git@vger.kernel.org, Andreas Schwab From: Johannes Sixt Message-ID: Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 21:54:57 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Am 11.11.2016 um 21:48 schrieb Junio C Hamano: > Johannes Sixt writes: > >> Good point. Here is an updated version. > > Unfortunately, I already took the version before this one and > started my integration cycle today. I'll wiggle this in; it > essentially is about adding a big comment to explain what is going > on and then moving the when-finished down below it, right? Correct. Thank you very much! -- Hannes