Re: [PATCH 4/4] doc add: renormalize is not idempotent for CRCRLF

[Philip Oakley <philipoakley@iee.email>]

On 10/07/2022 23:04, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Philip Oakley <philipoakley@iee.email> writes:
>
>>>> +	This option implies `-u`. Lone CR characters are untouched, so
>>>> +	cleaning *^* not idempotent. A CRCRLF sequence cleans to CRLF.
>>> Lack of verb BE somewhere. 
>> '^' It took me three re-reads to see my mistyping as my head knew what
>> I'd meant to write, I've marked above as a note to self.
>> Aside: Are there any guides / suggestions / how-to's for on-line
>> reviewing that you can recommend o
> Sorry, but I do not know of any good "trick" to fight against our
> common tendency to easily miss trivial typoes and thinkos in what we
> ourselves wrote.  We can be surprisingly blind to what a colleague
> can spot immediately, and that is why it helps to have a thorough
> read-through by a reviewer with fresh eyes.  When I was a more
> prolific contributor, I sometimes tried to read aloud what I wrote
> to myself, both docs and code, and caught silly mistakes before
> sending them out to the list, but I do not recommend it to others.

Thanks. There does appear to be a lack of literature or articles in this
area of on-list reviewing

I've not even seen an list of snippets collated from email advice. 
Other than the email etiquette's starter for ten on don't top post ;-)

--
Philip