From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS53758 23.128.96.0/24 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC5DF1F8C6 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2021 01:54:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230080AbhF2B4W (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jun 2021 21:56:22 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:47444 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229910AbhF2B4W (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jun 2021 21:56:22 -0400 Received: from mail-io1-xd34.google.com (mail-io1-xd34.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d34]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91098C061574 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 18:53:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-io1-xd34.google.com with SMTP id g22so24800536iom.1 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 18:53:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=822F+7jg04PKc5FVTtqqNhzERkuqg23LegdWeDe+p5k=; b=lWOW9WjC7oO1n/rerD7DQBIPh+UVBtO9ExDpeG7fjlIoKaySBoY0e4qqV9Fmwvgv0j NbUGkdYKcUJ9IwKyaaRDbr3yVNy7xrJyCc3bZBMQaroVDNjJ2xr9JmQKDM4Yh6/aI1Or JwpLrZkxYAljEdrnWVWQjFqoz1OGTYbK5qyMEIujZ2Qov/AsUKyzr8FtYmvH0liNY81g EIafmQ59LVilHEz60RJKQwBvGzKynFlCTKCqZ3Rrtrsediz673n9TuosmSFO7bgGA3Dp 76RAfwwWqI5N//fZ68RZHgNKRIrVqVyjcjkbPTMSEvW1PtCKWCYQuGsOwB824+45E5B/ 7SCA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=822F+7jg04PKc5FVTtqqNhzERkuqg23LegdWeDe+p5k=; b=PS1QhRm0nHP99jD8hBZz0MCUw0EBRTLo34wE4jP9FBu4XzKeLdKDugCKyypfS01aDb S/oos1P4oEGjiPMLKlOPfn63pcNFHW717EoBbiINn5ZRnEsyJ0stkqDPlOMfIARUlHl4 Wnm8t03kcvELRR/cs1wX2M1kTK/kvHHaD0LGXXBV8M6UyIJ+MnZYm2NAhGQb3RXNI/Gi +mNh9C23aUpO9/ehMlRnWaGAQevQysfShir5T5tdQdRbUBnLHQTqzUfiktAbmPq8lBSE zhEthVJxPLReYYc9/9bphqwEdhq5Chwpw5s8H+kYk9AbsGAd0SfzgAth06ctw+RfKpq5 9xVw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532fOarfJ9LjNkRyhw/iM4/iNpaDGs8snbrWGX7XZn8Xv2lMbbrk +MNw+aTvUCh81S59YjeUGOk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxIPKQvD3O1m546N5Z3mjb338Iy2TGE0qQYg57cL4mkDkoW0rW3rRrHwQAPfDncWUAl1XANpg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6638:1349:: with SMTP id u9mr2096317jad.43.1624931633943; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 18:53:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2600:1700:e72:80a0:707c:50a9:e7e5:baa? ([2600:1700:e72:80a0:707c:50a9:e7e5:baa]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h18sm9156998ilr.86.2021.06.28.18.53.52 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 28 Jun 2021 18:53:53 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] CodingGuidelines: recommend singular they To: Junio C Hamano , "brian m. carlson" Cc: =?UTF-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsCBCamFybWFzb24=?= , Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget , git@vger.kernel.org, jrnieder@gmail.com, emilyshaffer@google.com, Andrei Rybak , Felipe Contreras , Robert Karszniewicz , Jeff King , "Kerry, Richard" , Phillip Susi , Johannes Schindelin , Bagas Sanjaya , Derrick Stolee , Derrick Stolee References: <87a6nryt51.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com> <87bl85y15s.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com> From: Derrick Stolee Message-ID: Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2021 21:53:51 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On 6/28/2021 6:32 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Junio C Hamano writes: >> I would like to consider that the last draft I did [*1*] based on >> earlier suggestions by Derrick and Ævar would be a reasonable middle >> ground. >> >> I'll go mostly offline next week---I'd notice if the list came up >> with a vastly different concensus when I come back, but hopefully >> not ;-) > > Well, I misspoke. If the list reached a consensus while I was away, > then that would have been a happy outcome, whether it was close to, > or vastly different from, the one I suggested. I hope that my reply to your attempt was clear that I found it to be a good approach. I'm happy with it. Thanks, -Stolee