From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: [PATCH] user.default: New config to prevent using the default values for user.* Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2008 03:22:26 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: References: <1204744684-2043-1-git-send-email-sbejar@gmail.com> <20080305204414.GB4877@steel.home> <8aa486160803061345k690af0dcv14fe5d62b310ad6f@mail.gmail.com> <20080307164111.GB4899@steel.home> <8aa486160803071613pdacc88fkabc10f52da56ad5d@mail.gmail.com> <7v7igeynl5.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Santi_B=E9jar?= , Alex Riesen , git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Mar 08 03:23:29 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JXoib-0004RG-C2 for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sat, 08 Mar 2008 03:23:25 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756702AbYCHCWZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Mar 2008 21:22:25 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756448AbYCHCWY (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Mar 2008 21:22:24 -0500 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:47521 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1754727AbYCHCWY (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Mar 2008 21:22:24 -0500 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 08 Mar 2008 02:22:22 -0000 Received: from host86-138-198-40.range86-138.btcentralplus.com (EHLO racer.home) [86.138.198.40] by mail.gmx.net (mp057) with SMTP; 08 Mar 2008 03:22:22 +0100 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/Dfn9MVcrD5nMr6zBt1EFArHWLtLeyA62ABpbNIv Mgt7/YSw14creZ X-X-Sender: gene099@racer.site In-Reply-To: <7v7igeynl5.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> User-Agent: Alpine 1.00 (LSU 882 2007-12-20) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Fri, 7 Mar 2008, Junio C Hamano wrote: > So I'd even argue that Santi's change to the message is an improvement > that removes geekspeak that is not particularly useful to the end user > in this context. > > However, I would also say that this message improvement does not belong > to user.default or whatever the configuration variable is called in this > round of proposal. It should be a separate patch, and it would be a > much easier sell than the rest of the patch series. That was the whole point of Alex' criticism. I was slightly irritated that his comments elicited a criticism of their own. Sorry for that, Dscho