From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/40] Add target architecture MinGW. Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 21:54:24 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: References: <1204138503-6126-1-git-send-email-johannes.sixt@telecom.at> <200802282140.30654.johannes.sixt@telecom.at> <200802292203.56899.johannes.sixt@telecom.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Johannes Sixt X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Feb 29 22:56:03 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JVDCl-0002zo-SB for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 22:55:48 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761569AbYB2VzF (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Feb 2008 16:55:05 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1761562AbYB2VzF (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Feb 2008 16:55:05 -0500 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:43447 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1761554AbYB2VzD (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Feb 2008 16:55:03 -0500 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 29 Feb 2008 21:55:01 -0000 Received: from host86-138-198-40.range86-138.btcentralplus.com (EHLO racer.home) [86.138.198.40] by mail.gmx.net (mp023) with SMTP; 29 Feb 2008 22:55:02 +0100 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+PKkcODcGPwjxw3j5Rkq6qAx4fXFGooR/1Y/pqx7 hBgtkV6eS/kEEe X-X-Sender: gene099@racer.site In-Reply-To: <200802292203.56899.johannes.sixt@telecom.at> User-Agent: Alpine 1.00 (LSU 882 2007-12-20) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Fri, 29 Feb 2008, Johannes Sixt wrote: > On Friday 29 February 2008 02:07, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > On Thu, 28 Feb 2008, Johannes Sixt wrote: > > > I thought about this, but I decided against it: git-compat-util.h is > > > the place to look for compatibility functions. A file compat/mingw.h > > > only introduces an extra indirection and only *hides* stuff instead of > > > making it obvious. > > > > Well, the thing is, there are quite a few definitions and declarations > > that are _only_ _ever_ interesting if you are on MinGW32. > > > > So maybe it is a good idea to hide it to all the other users. > > You get compat/mingw.h, but you don't get a zillion NO_. > The two are pretty much exclusive anyway. Deal? Deal. Ciao, Dscho