From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: [PATCH] New test to check the real "subtree" case Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 09:45:03 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: References: <7vprun32m2.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <20080228015122.GB31441@genesis.frugalware.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org, Daniel Barkalow To: Miklos Vajna X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Feb 28 10:46:15 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JUfLB-0001ga-Q7 for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Thu, 28 Feb 2008 10:46:14 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754494AbYB1Jph (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Feb 2008 04:45:37 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752345AbYB1Jph (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Feb 2008 04:45:37 -0500 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:51068 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1753421AbYB1Jph (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Feb 2008 04:45:37 -0500 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 28 Feb 2008 09:45:34 -0000 Received: from host86-138-198-40.range86-138.btcentralplus.com (EHLO racer.home) [86.138.198.40] by mail.gmx.net (mp013) with SMTP; 28 Feb 2008 10:45:34 +0100 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18oqfwENSAoBU4p2bsyNOsZ/OrFgzPfcpzoSdkqH8 5Htw5yAtbXsRLq X-X-Sender: gene099@racer.site In-Reply-To: <20080228015122.GB31441@genesis.frugalware.org> User-Agent: Alpine 1.00 (LSU 882 2007-12-20) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Thu, 28 Feb 2008, Miklos Vajna wrote: > On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 11:16:21AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > A new test t6029 currently only tests the strategy is available, > > but it should be enhanced to check the real "subtree" case. > > i think something like this should do it. > > t/t3035-merge-subtree.sh | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Why yet another file? Why not enhance t6029, as suggested? Ciao, Dscho