* did we ever resolve what "known to Git" should mean?
@ 2019-03-06 14:44 Robert P. J. Day
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Robert P. J. Day @ 2019-03-06 14:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Git Mailing list
going back to a couple threads:
https://marc.info/?l=git&m=151048015116473&w=2
https://marc.info/?l=git&m=152690160605723&w=2
and i'm going to try to clarify what (if anything) was decided
regarding the internally inconsistent phrase "known to Git." junio's
take on this here:
https://marc.info/?l=git&m=152695527902711&w=2
was to banish the phrase entirely in favour of some combination of
"tracked" and/or "added to the index."
thoughts?
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca/dokuwiki
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2019-03-06 14:44 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-03-06 14:44 did we ever resolve what "known to Git" should mean? Robert P. J. Day
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).