From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@crashcourse.ca>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Git Mailing list <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc: Remove explanation of "--" from several man pages
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2017 04:22:22 -0500 (EST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.21.1711130357190.10471@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqq8tfaak6s.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
On Mon, 13 Nov 2017, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@crashcourse.ca> writes:
>
> > There is no value in individual man pages explaining the purpose
> > of the "--" separator.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@crashcourse.ca>
> >
> > ---
> >
> > unless every man page explains that option, it's pointless to
> > have just *some* man pages explaining it, so might as well remove
> > it from all of them.
>
> Please do not remove diffstat that format-patch gave you at this
> point. While commenting on the hunk on "git add", I wanted to see
> if you touched "git rm", and the diffstat at front _is_ the go-to
> place to do so for reviewers.
apologies, won't happen again.
> > diff --git a/Documentation/git-add.txt b/Documentation/git-add.txt
> > index b700beaff..69d625285 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/git-add.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/git-add.txt
> > @@ -180,11 +180,6 @@ for "git add --no-all <pathspec>...", i.e. ignored removed files.
> > bit is only changed in the index, the files on disk are left
> > unchanged.
> >
> > -\--::
> > - This option can be used to separate command-line options from
> > - the list of files, (useful when filenames might be mistaken
> > - for command-line options).
> > -
>
> I do not think if this removal alone is a good idea.
>
> Before this can happen, the description for "--" in other pages,
> (like gitcli(7), may need to be extended. Right now, gitcli's
> mention of "--" is only about turning off disambiguation between
> revs and pathspecs, and it does not cover this case
>
> $ >./--foo-bar
> $ git add -- --foo-bar
>
> even though the description you are removing would have helped the
> reader to understand why "--" is there. The hunk on "git rm" shares
> the same issue.
i don't see the problem here ... in the above, "--foobar" is clearly
a pathspec. and if you think that's a special case that needs special
explanation, then that argument surely applies to several other
commands and their man pages.
the main point here is that it's inconsistent to have *some* man
pages explicitly explain "--" and not have *all* of them explain it.
either they all should, or none of them should, and there's little
value in suggesting that the occasional man page somehow deserves
special treatment.
> > Configuration
> > -------------
> > diff --git a/Documentation/git-check-attr.txt b/Documentation/git-check-attr.txt
> > index aa3b2bf2f..0ae2523e0 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/git-check-attr.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/git-check-attr.txt
> > @@ -36,10 +36,6 @@ OPTIONS
> > If `--stdin` is also given, input paths are separated
> > with a NUL character instead of a linefeed character.
> >
> > -\--::
> > - Interpret all preceding arguments as attributes and all following
> > - arguments as path names.
> > -
>
> This also has a similar issue. "--" here is not between revs and
> pathspecs but is between attributes and pathspecs.
that can already be seen in the SYNOPSIS for that command, it does
not require further explanation:
SYNOPSIS
git check-attr [-a | --all | attr...] [--] pathname...
> > diff --git a/Documentation/git-ls-files.txt b/Documentation/git-ls-files.txt
> > index d153c17e0..93ebb020c 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/git-ls-files.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/git-ls-files.txt
> > @@ -171,9 +171,6 @@ Both the <eolinfo> in the index ("i/<eolinfo>")
> > and in the working tree ("w/<eolinfo>") are shown for regular files,
> > followed by the ("attr/<eolattr>").
> >
> > -\--::
> > - Do not interpret any more arguments as options.
>
> These removals would become a good idea, once we say that we would
> use "--" to mean "you will not see any --flags after this point" (as
> commonly seen in programs that are not Git) somewhere central like
> gitcli(7).
if you want to suggest some wording to make that happen, that would
be great, but i'm standing by my opinion that there is no rationale
for *any* man page explaining what "--" means when, as far as i can
tell, it always means the same thing.
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-13 9:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-12 21:02 [PATCH] doc: Remove explanation of "--" from several man pages Robert P. J. Day
2017-11-13 4:15 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-11-13 9:22 ` Robert P. J. Day [this message]
2017-11-13 9:48 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-11-13 9:56 ` Robert P. J. Day
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.21.1711130357190.10471@localhost.localdomain \
--to=rpjday@crashcourse.ca \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).