From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 0/6] duplicate objects and delta cycles, oh my! Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 19:35:17 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: References: <20130821204955.GA28025@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20130821205220.GB28165@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20130822144305.GA21219@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20130822231215.GA16978@sigill.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Cc: Git Mailing List , Duy Nguyen , Junio C Hamano , "Shawn O. Pearce" To: Jeff King X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Aug 23 01:35:33 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VCePZ-0000pk-Nt for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 01:35:30 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754450Ab3HVXf0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Aug 2013 19:35:26 -0400 Received: from relais.videotron.ca ([24.201.245.36]:25390 "EHLO relais.videotron.ca" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753411Ab3HVXfZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Aug 2013 19:35:25 -0400 Received: from xanadu.home ([70.83.209.44]) by VL-VM-MR005.ip.videotron.ca (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-22.01 64bit (built Apr 21 2011)) with ESMTP id <0MRY00H4SHITG1A0@VL-VM-MR005.ip.videotron.ca> for git@vger.kernel.org; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 19:35:17 -0400 (EDT) In-reply-to: <20130822231215.GA16978@sigill.intra.peff.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.03 (LFD 1266 2009-07-14) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Thu, 22 Aug 2013, Jeff King wrote: > On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 10:43:05AM -0400, Jeff King wrote: > > > > write_idx_file() is called after index-pack processes all delta > > > objects. Could resolve_deltas() go cyclic with certain duplicate > > > object setup? > > > > Good question. I'm not sure. I'll check it out. > > I think the answer is "no", based on both reasoning and testing (both of > which are included in patches 3-4 of the series below). > > So here's my re-roll of the series. This looks all good to me. Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre Nicolas