From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: Fix various sparse warnings in the git source code Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 10:52:17 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Junio C Hamano , Git Mailing List To: Matthieu Moy X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Jun 18 19:53:30 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MHLnk-00082R-DZ for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 19:53:28 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753586AbZFRRxS (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Jun 2009 13:53:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752887AbZFRRxS (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Jun 2009 13:53:18 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:51674 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752857AbZFRRxR (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Jun 2009 13:53:17 -0400 Received: from imap1.linux-foundation.org (imap1.linux-foundation.org [140.211.169.55]) by smtp1.linux-foundation.org (8.14.2/8.13.5/Debian-3ubuntu1.1) with ESMTP id n5IHqIts013750 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 18 Jun 2009 10:52:19 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by imap1.linux-foundation.org (8.13.5.20060308/8.13.5/Debian-3ubuntu1.1) with ESMTP id n5IHqHC1024275; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 10:52:18 -0700 X-X-Sender: torvalds@localhost.localdomain In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Alpine 2.01 (LFD 1184 2008-12-16) X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.472 required=5 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.4-osdl_revision__1.47__ X-MIMEDefang-Filter: lf$Revision: 1.188 $ X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.63 on 140.211.169.13 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Thu, 18 Jun 2009, Matthieu Moy wrote: > Linus Torvalds writes: > > > Sparse wwants to see declarations for any functions you export. A lack > > fo a declaration tends to mean that you should either add one, or > > Patch content is good, but in case it matters, you can s/wwants/wants/ > and s/fo/for/ in the commit message. My speling is gud, thak you vety much. I just miss a fwe keys. That "fo" should not be "for", it should be "of". Of course, the "wwants" may not be a typo. Maybe it's like "iff": "iff" means "if and only if", and "wants" means "wants and really wants"? You be the judge. Linus