From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/6] send-email: Add --delay for separating emails Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2009 13:48:23 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: References: <49dcb464.06d7720a.66ca.ffffbd30@mx.google.com> <20090409081443.GB17221@coredump.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Cc: Michael Witten , Nicolas Sebrecht , Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org To: Jeff King X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Apr 09 19:50:13 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LryO6-0001M7-HB for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Thu, 09 Apr 2009 19:50:07 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1764076AbZDIRsc (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Apr 2009 13:48:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1760273AbZDIRsc (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Apr 2009 13:48:32 -0400 Received: from relais.videotron.ca ([24.201.245.36]:22120 "EHLO relais.videotron.ca" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758877AbZDIRsb (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Apr 2009 13:48:31 -0400 Received: from xanadu.home ([66.131.194.97]) by VL-MH-MR002.ip.videotron.ca (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-4.01 (built Aug 3 2007; 32bit)) with ESMTP id <0KHU00CBAHGNF9T0@VL-MH-MR002.ip.videotron.ca> for git@vger.kernel.org; Thu, 09 Apr 2009 13:48:25 -0400 (EDT) X-X-Sender: nico@xanadu.home In-reply-to: <20090409081443.GB17221@coredump.intra.peff.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LFD 1167 2008-08-23) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Thu, 9 Apr 2009, Jeff King wrote: > On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 09:25:25AM -0500, Michael Witten wrote: > > > Firstly, I presume that someone is electing to use this option, so it is > > almost by definition not annoying for that person. > > Sure, obviously only people who enable it will be affected. I was > thinking of it more in terms of group economics: how many people _will_ > enable it, because they think the payoff outweighs the annoyance. My ISP doesn't allow me to send more than 20 emails at once. So if a patch series has more than 20 patches, send-email will be denied the sending of the end of the series, which is rather anoying. I didn't test this option (have no large patch series to post at the moment), but if it could allow me to easily work around the ISP restriction then I would be happy. Nicolas