From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Subject: Re: Which freedesktop.org "design flaws" in git are still relevant?
Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:56:44 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.00.0802291551310.4911@xanadu.home>
References: <51419b2c0802291232w166b3100yabd30ba30df6ef1f@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
Cc: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>, git@vger.kernel.org
To: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Feb 29 21:57:50 2008
Return-path: <git-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org
Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1JVCIM-00069P-1a
	for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 21:57:30 +0100
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1755699AbYB2U4q (ORCPT <rfc822;gcvg-git-2@m.gmane.org>);
	Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:56:46 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755230AbYB2U4q
	(ORCPT <rfc822;git-outgoing>); Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:56:46 -0500
Received: from relais.videotron.ca ([24.201.245.36]:26326 "EHLO
	relais.videotron.ca" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1753534AbYB2U4p (ORCPT <rfc822;git@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:56:45 -0500
Received: from xanadu.home ([66.131.194.97]) by VL-MH-MR001.ip.videotron.ca
 (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-4.01 (built Aug  3 2007; 32bit))
 with ESMTP id <0JX000FAWQ6KEVC0@VL-MH-MR001.ip.videotron.ca> for
 git@vger.kernel.org; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:56:44 -0500 (EST)
X-X-Sender: nico@xanadu.home
In-reply-to: <51419b2c0802291232w166b3100yabd30ba30df6ef1f@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 1.00 (LFD 882 2007-12-20)
Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <git.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/75559>

On Fri, 29 Feb 2008, Elijah Newren wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> The page http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Infrastructure/git/UIFlaws
> contains a number of claimed UI flaws of git.  I suspect that a number
> of them are out-of-date; it doesn't seem to jive with my recent
> reading of the documentation.  Could anyone point out which are still
> accurate with recent git, and which aren't?

It says:

	Infrastructure/git/UIFlaws (last edited 2007-06-03 18:41:26 by 
	JakubNarebski) 

and despite being updated almost 9 months ago, the content feels even 
older than that.

Jakub?


Nicolas