From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: remote#branch Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 12:53:21 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: References: <20071029174000.GA4449@efreet.light.src> <20071029214925.GH21133@thunk.org> <20071030030104.GK21133@thunk.org> <7vtzo9s221.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <20071030044026.GA9600@thunk.org> <20071030053732.GA16963@hermes.priv> <20071030193610.GA4442@efreet.light.src> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=us-ascii Cc: Tom Prince , Theodore Tso , Junio C Hamano , Johannes Schindelin , Petr Baudis , Paolo Ciarrocchi , git@vger.kernel.org To: Jan Hudec X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Oct 30 20:55:38 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ImxBW-0002U9-9c for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 30 Oct 2007 20:55:34 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753024AbXJ3Tyt (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Oct 2007 15:54:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752990AbXJ3Tyt (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Oct 2007 15:54:49 -0400 Received: from smtp2.linux-foundation.org ([207.189.120.14]:36154 "EHLO smtp2.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752953AbXJ3Tys (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Oct 2007 15:54:48 -0400 Received: from imap1.linux-foundation.org (imap1.linux-foundation.org [207.189.120.55]) by smtp2.linux-foundation.org (8.13.5.20060308/8.13.5/Debian-3ubuntu1.1) with ESMTP id l9UJrRKX001175 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 30 Oct 2007 12:53:28 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by imap1.linux-foundation.org (8.13.5.20060308/8.13.5/Debian-3ubuntu1.1) with ESMTP id l9UJrLxT025079; Tue, 30 Oct 2007 12:53:23 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20071030193610.GA4442@efreet.light.src> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.431 required=5 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,J_CHICKENPOX_66 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0-osdl_revision__1.47__ X-MIMEDefang-Filter: lf$Revision: 1.188 $ X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.53 on 207.189.120.14 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Tue, 30 Oct 2007, Jan Hudec wrote: > > > > Now, the *transport* back-end may end up quoting it, of course, the same > > way it may end up using some random protocol. The user shouldn't care > > about the implementation details! > > Yes. But the server will unquote it. ' ' should not have been there, but it's > just passed through if it was. '+' is quoting for ' ' and '%20' is quoting > for ' ' as well. Therefore all these three addresses are the *SAME*. Ok, you have some reading comprehension skills. Read the above again. I'd certainly hope that *curl* does the proper quoting. That's a transport issue. Linus