Hi Junio & René,

On Tue, 7 Feb 2017, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de> writes:
> 
> > Swapping between different types would then still have to be done
> > manually, but I wonder how common that is -- couldn't find such a case
> > in our tree.
> 
> I do not think it is a common thing to do, and more importantly, I doubt
> we want to hide such a swap inside a macro.  And that is why I said the
> seemingly extra "type" thing may be an improvement over your original
> SWAP() thing if it gives us more type safety.
> 
> It seems that the thread has been quite for a while. Perhaps people are
> happy enough with your patches?  If so, let's move it forward, but I'll
> wait for a while in case follow-up discussion appears soonish.  The
> changes are fairly well isolated and I do not think we are in a hurry.

I am still unhappy about choosing to complicate things and lean heavily on
the compiler to make things right again.

But it appears that I am the only one with this concern, so go ahead. I
promise not to say "I told you so" in case that it breaks things or that
certain platforms are experiencing a disadvantage.

Ciao,
Johannes