From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Krefting Subject: Re: L10n regression in 1.8.0.rc2: diffstat summary (git diff --stat, git format-patch) Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2012 00:38:42 +0100 (CET) Organization: /universe/earth/europe/norway/oslo Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Git Mailing List , Jiang Xin To: Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Oct 20 01:39:03 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TPM9e-0001PO-1m for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Sat, 20 Oct 2012 01:39:02 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932285Ab2JSXiu (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Oct 2012 19:38:50 -0400 Received: from upper-gw.cixit.se ([92.43.32.133]:41251 "EHLO mail.cixit.se" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754309Ab2JSXit (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Oct 2012 19:38:49 -0400 Received: from ds9.cixit.se (peter@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.cixit.se (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9.4) with ESMTP id q9JNchwq016304 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 20 Oct 2012 01:38:43 +0200 Received: from localhost (peter@localhost) by ds9.cixit.se (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) with ESMTP id q9JNcg7S016301; Sat, 20 Oct 2012 01:38:42 +0200 X-Authentication-Warning: ds9.cixit.se: peter owned process doing -bs In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) Accept: text/plain X-Warning: Junk / bulk email will be reported X-Rating: This message is not to be eaten by humans X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.3.7 (mail.cixit.se [127.0.0.1]); Sat, 20 Oct 2012 01:38:43 +0200 (CEST) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy: > It's the result of this discussion [1]. I don't remember exactly the > open issues. But I think it involves drawing a line between team > language vs local language, whether team language can be anything > other than English, the maintenance cost for supporting it Like I said, I can see that defaulting format-patch to output English is a good idea (since its output is "protocol data" and not something for human consumption), it is the output from diff and show that I want to have localized. I'll see if I can come up with a patch that cater for both use-cases. Maybe I can also fix so that log output is fully localized at the same time (translating "commit", "author", "date" and outputting locale dates (although my locale usess ISO dates, so I can get proper formatting there already)). -- \\// Peter - http://www.softwolves.pp.se/