From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: git.wiki.kernel.org spam ... Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2013 00:27:12 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: rupert THURNER X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Jan 05 00:27:37 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TrGfo-0000Wh-G2 for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Sat, 05 Jan 2013 00:27:36 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755386Ab3ADX1R (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Jan 2013 18:27:17 -0500 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]:50857 "EHLO mout.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755289Ab3ADX1P (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Jan 2013 18:27:15 -0500 Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([10.1.76.20]) by mrigmx.server.lan (mrigmx002) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0M0NrX-1T1MuC16Nh-00ucuv for ; Sat, 05 Jan 2013 00:27:13 +0100 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 04 Jan 2013 23:27:13 -0000 Received: from s15462909.onlinehome-server.info (EHLO s15462909.onlinehome-server.info) [87.106.4.80] by mail.gmx.net (mp020) with SMTP; 05 Jan 2013 00:27:13 +0100 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+T5bMQJEaTwREGpMrBwjzORzy55cUyjMkD0d30ux A+f0sql49MMahB X-X-Sender: schindelin@s15462909.onlinehome-server.info In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Alpine 1.00 (DEB 882 2007-12-20) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi Rupert, On Sat, 5 Jan 2013, rupert THURNER wrote: > 2012/12/31 Johannes Schindelin : > there are 3 admins: > * https://git.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Special:Contributions/KorgWikiSysop, > last contribution january 2010 > * https://git.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Special:Contributions/Warthog9, > last contribution august 2010 > * https://git.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Special:Contributions/Dscho, > last contribution august 2010 > > and you were (by far) the most active. I was. John Hawley trusted me when I asked for admin privileges to keep the spam at bay, but a very vocal voice on the mailing list tried to discredit my work, and in the wake of the ensuing mailing list thread I got the impression that that feeling was universal, so I abided and stopped. > this leaves me a little confused. who would be then be responsible? who > would be responsible for upgrading / installing anything at the wiki? That would be John Hawley. Ciao, Dscho