From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add new git-remote-hd helper Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2012 22:03:31 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: References: <1350478721-3685-1-git-send-email-felipe.contreras@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Sverre Rabbelier , git@vger.kernel.org, Junio C Hamano , Ilari Liusvaara , Daniel Barkalow To: Felipe Contreras X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Oct 21 22:03:48 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TQ1kS-0004Gb-7a for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Sun, 21 Oct 2012 22:03:48 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932099Ab2JUUDh (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Oct 2012 16:03:37 -0400 Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.22]:42939 "HELO mailout-de.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1754257Ab2JUUDg (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Oct 2012 16:03:36 -0400 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 21 Oct 2012 20:03:33 -0000 Received: from g228074099.adsl.alicedsl.de (EHLO bonsai2.localdomain) [92.228.74.99] by mail.gmx.net (mp034) with SMTP; 21 Oct 2012 22:03:33 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19QbipYuLtQzparDr7O5NFaGkjZEqs2yuDjvYhEnc 5MWcLTxIaLoiAF X-X-Sender: gene099@bonsai2 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Alpine 1.00 (DEB 882 2007-12-20) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi Felipe, On Sun, 21 Oct 2012, Felipe Contreras wrote: > On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Johannes Schindelin > wrote: > > > Without push support, remote-hg is useless to me. Without regression > > tests proving that it is rock solid, I will not use remote-hg. > > Done and done. My remote-hg now has support for pushing, all in less > than 500 lines of code. It also manages to pass all 14 of the "extensive > tests" of your remote-hg. Anything else? While I think that a lot of effort was duplicated now, and while I am still interested in less handwaving arguments than "I find the code bloated", I will compare the performance on both hg and openjdk and if I do not find any issues, have a look at the code, too. That will have to wait until I am home in a bit more than a week, though. Ciao, Johannes P.S.: Sverre's remote-hg does not really handle octopus merges. It is incomplete. I had a good plan how to complete it (see the msysGit wiki page about remote-hg) but lacked the time to implement it (the problem is that hg does not have octopus merges, and we want things to be bidirectional).