From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: [PATCH] mailmap: resurrect lower-casing of email addresses Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 01:08:44 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: References: <49D53ABF.80706@gmail.com> <7v63hmekyv.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <49D542FA.3070304@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org To: A Large Angry SCM X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Apr 03 01:07:56 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LpW0p-0005J1-FO for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 01:07:55 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752403AbZDBXGX (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Apr 2009 19:06:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751454AbZDBXGX (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Apr 2009 19:06:23 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:44465 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751348AbZDBXGW (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Apr 2009 19:06:22 -0400 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 02 Apr 2009 23:06:20 -0000 Received: from pacific.mpi-cbg.de (EHLO pacific.mpi-cbg.de) [141.5.10.38] by mail.gmx.net (mp034) with SMTP; 03 Apr 2009 01:06:20 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+njGRVuzKnIMVChmqnwWmLGG5wuYUO9CtiO+kwiW 6MCzo+spVxl6Ld X-X-Sender: schindelin@pacific.mpi-cbg.de In-Reply-To: <49D542FA.3070304@gmail.com> User-Agent: Alpine 1.00 (DEB 882 2007-12-20) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.66 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, A Large Angry SCM wrote: > Junio C Hamano wrote: > > Johannes Schindelin writes: > > > > > > What part of the email address is this going to lowercase? Only the > > > > domain > > > > name is case agnostic. > > > > That is my understanding of RFC, too. Let's see where this mail goes to > > find out how much more lenient the real world is ;-). > > > > > > Many email providers/servers are lenient when it comes to case in the > local part of an email address (after all, they control the > interpretation) but not every provider/server is and the RFC is VERY > clear on this issue. And in one of my projects it is _very_ clear that this strict interpretation of the RFC, which does not matter in reality, _actively_ _hurts_. In the alternative, can I ask you to adjust my .mailmap in your free time? Thankyouverymuch, Dscho