From: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: sverre@rabbelier.nl, Git Mailinglist <git@vger.kernel.org>,
Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@frugalware.org>
Subject: Re: theirs/ours was Re: [PATCH 6/6] Add a new test for using a custom merge strategy
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 20:09:55 +0100 (BST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.00.0807282008470.8986@racer> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080728185604.GA26322@sigill.intra.peff.net>
Hi,
On Mon, 28 Jul 2008, Jeff King wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 04:54:17PM +0200, Sverre Rabbelier wrote:
>
> > Thus resulting in a 'wrong way around' merge as part of master? It
> > would say "Merge branch 'master' into otherbranch", while what
> > happened was "Merge branch 'otherbranch' into master".
> >
> > So, in short: what does the list think about adding
> > "git-merge-theirs", that does (although possibly less 'hackish'):
> >
> > cat > git-merge-theirs << EOF
> > #!/bin/sh
> > eval git read-tree --reset -u \\\$\$#
> > EOF
>
> I ran into this exact situation while showing somebody how awesome git
> was, and it was a little embarrasing to say "oops, now we have to do
> this backwards."
Well, I have to say that the workflow is a bit backwards if the person who
_publishes_ the thing is the one saying "Ooops, my version no goodie,
other version please, but so that pull still works".
I would have expected the one who has the good version to make the choice.
Ciao,
Dscho
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-28 19:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-28 14:54 theirs/ours was Re: [PATCH 6/6] Add a new test for using a custom merge strategy Sverre Rabbelier
2008-07-28 18:14 ` Miklos Vajna
2008-07-28 19:48 ` Sverre Rabbelier
2008-07-28 18:56 ` Jeff King
2008-07-28 19:09 ` Johannes Schindelin [this message]
2008-07-28 19:26 ` Jeff King
2008-07-28 20:00 ` Avery Pennarun
2008-07-28 23:27 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-07-29 0:09 ` Sverre Rabbelier
2008-07-29 4:31 ` Jeff King
2008-07-29 4:38 ` Jeff King
2008-07-29 11:05 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-07-29 12:36 ` Jeff King
2008-07-29 12:42 ` Sverre Rabbelier
2008-07-29 0:37 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-07-29 5:02 ` Jeff King
2008-07-29 9:36 ` Mike Ralphson
2008-07-29 12:42 ` Jeff King
2008-07-28 19:52 ` Sverre Rabbelier
2008-07-28 20:07 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-07-28 20:10 ` Sverre Rabbelier
2008-07-28 20:20 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-07-28 20:24 ` Sverre Rabbelier
2008-07-28 21:16 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-07-28 21:35 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-07-28 21:39 ` Sverre Rabbelier
2008-07-29 5:08 ` Jeff King
2008-07-29 6:35 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.1.00.0807282008470.8986@racer \
--to=johannes.schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
--cc=sverre@rabbelier.nl \
--cc=vmiklos@frugalware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).