From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: [PATCH] Set up argv0_path correctly, even when argv[0] is just the basename Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 17:35:10 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: References: <1217065304-27815-1-git-send-email-prohaska@zib.de> <488B3A97.6000606@keyaccess.nl> <488B409D.40709@keyaccess.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Steffen Prohaska , Johannes Sixt , git@vger.kernel.org, Junio C Hamano To: Rene Herman X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Jul 26 17:35:11 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KMlnb-0001iU-3G for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sat, 26 Jul 2008 17:35:11 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752331AbYGZPeL (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 Jul 2008 11:34:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752276AbYGZPeK (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 Jul 2008 11:34:10 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:53378 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752244AbYGZPeJ (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 Jul 2008 11:34:09 -0400 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 26 Jul 2008 15:34:06 -0000 Received: from 88-107-142-10.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com (EHLO eeepc-johanness.st-andrews.ac.uk) [88.107.142.10] by mail.gmx.net (mp021) with SMTP; 26 Jul 2008 17:34:06 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+T0iEhJfeTYpILxFk6qgBE8DM6YVunHTPLftpHe0 W364JaqlG7OviH X-X-Sender: user@eeepc-johanness In-Reply-To: <488B409D.40709@keyaccess.nl> User-Agent: Alpine 1.00 (DEB 882 2007-12-20) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.76 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Sat, 26 Jul 2008, Rene Herman wrote: > Adding to the PATH is generally not disallowed by user level security. > Replacing the GIT binary generally is. Prepending to the PATH is generally not disallowed either. And that's just as good as replacing the Git binary. This issue is totally independent of Git. And it is totally bogus to think about the complicated issues when the "weakest link of the chain" is much easier to exploit. Hth, Dscho