From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: git-scm.com Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 05:07:02 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: References: <20080726025402.GF13539@leksak.fem-net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Scott Chacon , git@vger.kernel.org To: Stephan Beyer X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Jul 26 05:07:08 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KMa7c-0007Wk-ST for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sat, 26 Jul 2008 05:07:05 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752702AbYGZDGE (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Jul 2008 23:06:04 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752679AbYGZDGD (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Jul 2008 23:06:03 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:33908 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752669AbYGZDGB (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Jul 2008 23:06:01 -0400 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 26 Jul 2008 03:05:59 -0000 Received: from 88-107-142-10.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com (EHLO eeepc-johanness.st-andrews.ac.uk) [88.107.142.10] by mail.gmx.net (mp023) with SMTP; 26 Jul 2008 05:05:59 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/Zjx4BohrZw7xBRjmczu4wAiNa2rqkzpVpGAzO8y ajoBRUpdU8OFpw X-X-Sender: user@eeepc-johanness In-Reply-To: <20080726025402.GF13539@leksak.fem-net> User-Agent: Alpine 1.00 (DEB 882 2007-12-20) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.75 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Sat, 26 Jul 2008, Stephan Beyer wrote: > Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > I do not like the implication that Git eats trees. > > I still like the picture, though it can hurt environmentalists. It's not just environmentalists. If I put myself in the shoes of a Git newbie, I would get the impression that Git eats my trees, i.e. destroys them. Very good first impression. Not, Dscho