From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: [HACK] t/test-lib.sh HACK: Add -s/--show-hack to test suite. Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 15:41:41 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: References: <1215375751-30853-1-git-send-email-s-beyer@gmx.net> <20080707140841.GB6726@leksak.fem-net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Stephan Beyer X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Jul 07 16:44:51 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KFrxF-0006FT-8A for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Mon, 07 Jul 2008 16:44:37 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755449AbYGGOnj (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jul 2008 10:43:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755316AbYGGOnj (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jul 2008 10:43:39 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:58900 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1755363AbYGGOng (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jul 2008 10:43:36 -0400 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 07 Jul 2008 14:43:35 -0000 Received: from grape.st-and.ac.uk (EHLO grape.st-and.ac.uk) [138.251.155.28] by mail.gmx.net (mp067) with SMTP; 07 Jul 2008 16:43:35 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1962OF6ot16gDdLlTkZ07IS4VYw1uHMEyHDkIbcC1 4fRJ+dmGIAwLVE X-X-Sender: gene099@racer In-Reply-To: <20080707140841.GB6726@leksak.fem-net> User-Agent: Alpine 1.00 (DEB 882 2007-12-20) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.68 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Mon, 7 Jul 2008, Stephan Beyer wrote: > > > This option realizes a stupid hack that tries to run the test cases > > > line by line (separated by &&). > > > > In what way is that better than "sh -x t????-*.sh"? > > Your suggestion is more like "./t????-*.sh -v" instead of -s, at least > on bash and dash here. No, I meant without "-v". > But I didn't know the -x flag and it seems that this could be used in > test-lib.sh to make the hack faster, more robust and less hacky ;-) It would obsolete your hack, I suggest. Obviously, you haven't tried it yet. Hth, Dscho