From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] Allow git-apply to ignore the hunk headers Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 15:04:01 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: References: <4847CCD9.6000305@viscovery.net> <4847EBC3.8060509@viscovery.net> <4847F49F.8090004@viscovery.net> <48480123.7030903@viscovery.net> <7vabhz1t2f.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <7v4p87zcv6.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <4848E105.7050405@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Junio C Hamano , Johannes Sixt , git@vger.kernel.org To: Paolo Bonzini X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Jun 06 16:07:24 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1K4caB-0006cn-TI for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Fri, 06 Jun 2008 16:06:20 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751933AbYFFOF1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Jun 2008 10:05:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751308AbYFFOF1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Jun 2008 10:05:27 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:60379 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751162AbYFFOF0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Jun 2008 10:05:26 -0400 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 06 Jun 2008 14:05:25 -0000 Received: from pacific.mpi-cbg.de (EHLO [10.8.0.10]) [141.5.10.38] by mail.gmx.net (mp030) with SMTP; 06 Jun 2008 16:05:25 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/tRjk5CILtVtM3pu0UaHG9HmfGrfS0gFnIpZsvSN y5eGgPSeyjaXCp X-X-Sender: gene099@racer In-Reply-To: <4848E105.7050405@gnu.org> User-Agent: Alpine 1.00 (DEB 882 2007-12-20) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Fri, 6 Jun 2008, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > @@ -0,0 +0,0 @@ > > default: > > - return -1; > > + return len != 4 && memcmp(line - len, "-- \n", len); > > } > > You're never returning -1 here, right? You are a clever guy! I really do not return -1 here. But then, the return value is only checked for non-zeroness. As is obvious from the part you did not quote. > > However, this will not work if anybody has a signature starting with > > "@@ ", "+", " ", "-" or "diff "... > > I think that the main worry is the patches made with git-format-patch, > and those are not problematic. Actually, this change was done in v3 on _explicit_ request from Junio who wants to be able to use the patch for git-am, where we cannot rely on format-patch. So yes, they _are_ problematic. Thanks, Dscho