git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Andrei Rybak <rybak.a.v@gmail.com>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: "Junio C Hamano" <gitster@pobox.com>,
	"SZEDER Gábor" <szeder.dev@gmail.com>,
	"Git mailing list" <git@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Kirill Smelkov" <kirr@nexedi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] t5310-pack-bitmaps: fix bogus 'pack-objects to file can use bitmap' test
Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2018 23:37:59 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aedb7f33-65cc-5d63-4e7e-dd5f37831e19@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180819203253.GA5789@sigill.intra.peff.net>

On 19/08/18 22:32, Jeff King wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 19, 2018 at 07:50:42PM +0200, Andrei Rybak wrote:
> 
>>   1. Check both files at the same time (combination with Gábor's
>>      function):
>>
>> 	test_cmp () {
>> 		if test "$1" != - &&
>> 		   test "$2" != - &&
>> 		   ! test -s "$1" && 
>> 		   ! test -s "$2"
>> 		then
>> 			error "bug in test script: using test_cmp to check empty file; use test_must_be_empty instead"
>> 		fi
>> 		test_cmp_allow_empty "$@"
>> 	}
>>
>>      This will still be reporting to the developer clearly, but
>>      will only catch cases exactly like the bogus test in t5310.
> 
> Doesn't that have the opposite issue? If we expect non-empty output but
> the command produces empty output, we'd say "bug in the test script".
> But that is not true at all; it's a failed test.

No. Only when both "$1" and "$2" are empty files will the function above
report "bug in test script". From patch's commit message:

  ... both invocations produce empty 'pack{a,b}.objects' files, and the
  subsequent 'test_cmp' happily finds those two empty files identical.

That's what I meant by "will only catch cases exactly like the bogus
test in t5310".

However ...

> If we assume that "expect" is first (which is our convention but not
> necessarily guaranteed), then I think the best logic is something like:
> 
>   if $1 is empty; then
>     bug in the test script
>   elif test_cmp_allow_empty "$@"
>     test failure
> 
> We do not need to check $2 at all. An empty one is either irrelevant (if
> the expectation is empty), or a test failure (because it would not match
> the non-empty $1).

... this is indeed a better solution. I written out the cases for
updated test_cmp to straighten out my thinking:

 * both $1 and $2 are empty:
     bogus test:
       needs either fixing generation of both expect and actual
       or switching to test_must_be_empty
   OR
     bogus helper function, as Gábor described above:
       needs to switch to test_cmp_allow_empty
 
 * $1 is non-empty && $2 is empty
   proceeding with test
   test failure from GIT_TEST_CMP
 
 * $1 is empty && $2 is non-empty
   bogus test - needs either switching to test_must_be_empty
   (and after that test_must_be_empty will report failure)
   or fixing generation of expect (and after that test result
   depends on contents).
 
 * both $1 and $2 are non-empty
   proceeding with test
   result depends on contents

  reply	other threads:[~2018-08-19 21:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-14 11:47 [PATCH] t5310-pack-bitmaps: fix bogus 'pack-objects to file can use bitmap' test SZEDER Gábor
2018-08-14 21:49 ` Jeff King
2018-08-16 20:51 ` Andrei Rybak
2018-08-16 22:36   ` Junio C Hamano
2018-08-17 17:39     ` SZEDER Gábor
2018-08-17 19:27       ` Andrei Rybak
2018-08-17 20:09         ` Junio C Hamano
2018-08-19 17:50           ` Andrei Rybak
2018-08-19 20:32             ` Jeff King
2018-08-19 21:37               ` Andrei Rybak [this message]
2018-08-19 21:43                 ` Jeff King
2018-08-21 21:52                   ` Junio C Hamano
2018-08-17 20:15         ` SZEDER Gábor
2018-08-22 18:14   ` Matthew DeVore
2018-08-27 10:22 ` Kirill Smelkov
2018-08-27 23:04   ` Jeff King
2018-08-28  6:37     ` Kirill Smelkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aedb7f33-65cc-5d63-4e7e-dd5f37831e19@gmail.com \
    --to=rybak.a.v@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=kirr@nexedi.com \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=szeder.dev@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).