From: "kylezhao(赵柯宇)" <kylezhao@tencent.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
Kyle Zhao via GitGitGadget <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
Cc: "git@vger.kernel.org" <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [Internet]Re: [PATCH] merge-tree.c: add --merge-base=<commit> option
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2022 11:43:45 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ad27a59046e345a68669d3876a75772a@tencent.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqczadm93w.fsf@gitster.g>
Thanks for your reviews.
> In the original "trivial merge" mode, the command takes three trees
> without having to have this new option. In the new "write-tree"
> mode, currently it is incapable of taking the base, but it does not
> have to stay that way. Wouldn't it be sufficient to update the UI
> to
>
> git merge-tree [--write-tree] [<options>] [<base-commit>] <branch1> <branch2>
> git merge-tree [--trivial-merge] <base-commit> <branch1> <branch2>
>
> IOW, when you want to supply the base, you'd be explicit and ask for
> the new "write-tree" mode, i.e.
>
> $ git merge-tree --write-tree $(git merge-base branch^ branch) HEAD branch
>
> would be how you would use merge-tree to cherry-pick the commit at
> the tip of the branch on top of the current commit.
Referring to Newren's reply, if we need to implement octopus merges for git-merge-tree in the future, still need a new option,
so I haven't modified it yet.
>> @@ -402,6 +403,7 @@ struct merge_tree_options {
>> int allow_unrelated_histories;
>> int show_messages;
>> int name_only;
>> + char* merge_base;
>
> Style. We write in C, not in C++, and our asterisks stick to variables and members of structs, not types.
Done.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-28 12:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-27 12:12 [PATCH] merge-tree.c: add --merge-base=<commit> option Kyle Zhao via GitGitGadget
2022-10-27 18:09 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-10-28 8:20 ` Elijah Newren
2022-10-28 16:03 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-10-29 1:52 ` Elijah Newren
2022-10-28 11:43 ` kylezhao(赵柯宇) [this message]
2022-10-28 8:13 ` Elijah Newren
2022-10-28 11:54 ` [Internet]Re: " kylezhao(赵柯宇)
2022-10-28 11:55 ` [PATCH v2] " Kyle Zhao via GitGitGadget
2022-10-29 1:32 ` Elijah Newren
2022-10-29 3:42 ` [PATCH v3] " Kyle Zhao via GitGitGadget
2022-11-01 1:08 ` Elijah Newren
2022-11-01 8:55 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] merge-tree: allow specifying a base commit when --write-tree is passed Kyle Zhao via GitGitGadget
2022-11-01 8:55 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] merge-tree.c: add --merge-base=<commit> option Kyle Zhao via GitGitGadget
2022-11-01 8:55 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] merge-tree.c: support --merge-base in conjunction with --stdin Kyle Zhao via GitGitGadget
2022-11-03 1:13 ` Elijah Newren
2022-11-03 3:28 ` [Internet]Re: " kylezhao(赵柯宇)
2022-11-01 21:19 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] merge-tree: allow specifying a base commit when --write-tree is passed Taylor Blau
2022-11-03 3:29 ` [PATCH v5 " Kyle Zhao via GitGitGadget
2022-11-03 3:29 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] merge-tree.c: add --merge-base=<commit> option Kyle Zhao via GitGitGadget
2022-11-03 8:36 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-11-03 9:43 ` [Internet]Re: " kylezhao(赵柯宇)
2022-11-03 3:29 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] merge-tree.c: allow specifying the merge-base when --stdin is passed Kyle Zhao via GitGitGadget
2022-11-03 10:50 ` [PATCH v6 0/2] merge-tree: allow specifying a base commit when --write-tree " Kyle Zhao via GitGitGadget
2022-11-03 10:50 ` [PATCH v6 1/2] merge-tree.c: add --merge-base=<commit> option Kyle Zhao via GitGitGadget
2022-11-03 10:50 ` [PATCH v6 2/2] merge-tree.c: allow specifying the merge-base when --stdin is passed Kyle Zhao via GitGitGadget
2022-11-11 19:44 ` Elijah Newren
2022-11-11 23:45 ` [PATCH v7 0/2] merge-tree: allow specifying a base commit when --write-tree " Kyle Zhao via GitGitGadget
2022-11-11 23:45 ` [PATCH v7 1/2] merge-tree.c: add --merge-base=<commit> option Kyle Zhao via GitGitGadget
2022-11-22 3:04 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-11-22 3:52 ` [Internet]Re: " kylezhao(赵柯宇)
2022-11-22 4:28 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-11-22 5:42 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-11-22 7:47 ` [Internet]Re: " kylezhao(赵柯宇)
2022-11-11 23:45 ` [PATCH v7 2/2] merge-tree.c: allow specifying the merge-base when --stdin is passed Kyle Zhao via GitGitGadget
2022-11-12 0:32 ` [PATCH v7 0/2] merge-tree: allow specifying a base commit when --write-tree " Elijah Newren
2022-11-13 4:53 ` Taylor Blau
2022-11-13 4:54 ` Taylor Blau
2022-11-24 3:37 ` [PATCH v8 0/3] " Kyle Zhao via GitGitGadget
2022-11-24 3:37 ` [PATCH v8 1/3] merge-tree.c: add --merge-base=<commit> option Kyle Zhao via GitGitGadget
2022-11-24 3:37 ` [PATCH v8 2/3] merge-tree.c: allow specifying the merge-base when --stdin is passed Kyle Zhao via GitGitGadget
2022-11-24 3:37 ` [PATCH v8 3/3] docs: fix description of the `--merge-base` option Kyle Zhao via GitGitGadget
2022-11-25 5:28 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ad27a59046e345a68669d3876a75772a@tencent.com \
--to=kylezhao@tencent.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).