On Wed, May 01, 2024 at 03:06:19PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com> writes:
> 
> > +	if (!fdopen_lock_file(&lock->lk, "w"))
> > +		return error("unable to fdopen %s: %s",
> > +			     get_lock_file_path(&lock->lk), strerror(errno));
> > +
> > +	if (fprintf(get_lock_file_fp(&lock->lk), "ref: %s\n", target) < 0)
> > +		return error("unable to fprintf %s: %s",
> > +			     get_lock_file_path(&lock->lk), strerror(errno));
> 
> error() is end-user facing, so "fprintf" is probably a bit too
> precise?  "fprintf" -> "write to"
> 
> Also we may want to make them (not just this new message but other
> error() messages in related code paths) localizable but that is
> probably beyond the scope of this topic.

It only occurred to me now, but shouldn't we also support passing in a
`struct strbuf *err` here? The transactional code doesn't want us to
print error messages to `stderr`, but always supplies a buffer.

Patrick