git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] t1405: remove unneeded cleanup step
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 08:59:48 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zc3EdG7K0NqV61rC@tanuki> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqq4jeatz3n.fsf@gitster.g>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1999 bytes --]

On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 03:17:32PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> writes:
> 
> > In 5e00514745 (t1405: explictly delete reflogs for reftable, 2022-01-31)
> > we have added a test that explicitly deletes the reflog when not using
> > the "files" backend. This was required because back then, the "reftable"
> > backend didn't yet delete reflogs when deleting their corresponding
> > branches, and thus subsequent tests would fail because some unexpected
> > reflogs still exist.
> >
> > The "reftable" backend was eventually changed though so that it behaves
> > the same as the "files" backend and deletes reflogs when deleting refs.
> > This was done to make the "reftable" backend behave like the "files"
> > backend as closely as possible so that it can act as a drop-in
> > replacement.
> >
> > The cleanup-style test is thus not required anymore. Remove it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
> > ---
> >  t/t1405-main-ref-store.sh | 6 ------
> >  1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
> 
> Again, makes sense.
> 
> This is a tangent, but artificial limitations we imposed on reftable
> to be more similar to files backend may be something we would want
> to reconsider once reftable hits mainline and people actively start
> using it.  Not having to lose the reflog only because you removed a
> branch by mistake would be a powerful thing, as it would allow you
> to resurrect the branch as well as its log.  Being able to have a
> branch 'foo', with work related to 'foo' kept inbranches 'foo/arc1'
> 'foo/arc2', etc., would be a very nice organizational tool.
> 
> But it is a good idea to start limited and later making it looser.
> These two limitations are something all users are already familiar
> with, so it is not as cripplingly bad as it smells anyway.

Yeah, I very much agree with what you say here. We have it in our
backlog to change this behaviour once the initial dust has settled.

Patrick

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2024-02-15  8:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-09  7:23 [PATCH 0/7] t: drop more REFFILES prereqs Patrick Steinhardt
2024-02-09  7:23 ` [PATCH 1/7] t: move tests exercising the "files" backend Patrick Steinhardt
2024-02-14 22:45   ` Junio C Hamano
2024-02-09  7:23 ` [PATCH 2/7] t0410: enable tests with extensions with non-default repo format Patrick Steinhardt
2024-02-14 22:57   ` Junio C Hamano
2024-02-15  7:59     ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-02-15 17:18       ` Junio C Hamano
2024-02-09  7:23 ` [PATCH 3/7] t1400: exercise reflog with gaps with reftable backend Patrick Steinhardt
2024-02-14 22:59   ` Junio C Hamano
2024-02-09  7:23 ` [PATCH 4/7] t1404: make D/F conflict tests compatible " Patrick Steinhardt
2024-02-14 23:11   ` Junio C Hamano
2024-02-09  7:23 ` [PATCH 5/7] t1405: remove unneeded cleanup step Patrick Steinhardt
2024-02-14 23:17   ` Junio C Hamano
2024-02-15  7:59     ` Patrick Steinhardt [this message]
2024-02-09  7:23 ` [PATCH 6/7] t2011: exercise D/F conflicts with HEAD with the reftable backend Patrick Steinhardt
2024-02-09  7:23 ` [PATCH 7/7] t7003: ensure filter-branch prunes reflogs " Patrick Steinhardt
2024-02-11 14:00 ` [PATCH 0/7] t: drop more REFFILES prereqs Karthik Nayak
2024-02-14 23:20 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-02-15  8:14   ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-02-15  8:25 ` [PATCH v2 " Patrick Steinhardt
2024-02-15  8:25   ` [PATCH v2 1/7] t: move tests exercising the "files" backend Patrick Steinhardt
2024-02-15  8:25   ` [PATCH v2 2/7] t0410: convert tests to use DEFAULT_REPO_FORMAT prereq Patrick Steinhardt
2024-02-15 18:19     ` Junio C Hamano
2024-02-15  8:25   ` [PATCH v2 3/7] t1400: exercise reflog with gaps with reftable backend Patrick Steinhardt
2024-02-15  8:25   ` [PATCH v2 4/7] t1404: make D/F conflict tests compatible " Patrick Steinhardt
2024-02-15  8:25   ` [PATCH v2 5/7] t1405: remove unneeded cleanup step Patrick Steinhardt
2024-02-15  8:25   ` [PATCH v2 6/7] t2011: exercise D/F conflicts with HEAD with the reftable backend Patrick Steinhardt
2024-02-15  8:25   ` [PATCH v2 7/7] t7003: ensure filter-branch prunes reflogs " Patrick Steinhardt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Zc3EdG7K0NqV61rC@tanuki \
    --to=ps@pks.im \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).