On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 09:30:39AM +0100, Patrick Steinhardt wrote: > On Thu, Feb 01, 2024 at 07:17:45AM -0800, Karthik Nayak wrote: > > > + iter->err = reftable_iterator_next_ref(&iter->iter, &iter->ref); > > > + if (iter->err) > > > + break; > > > + > > > + /* > > > + * The files backend only lists references contained in > > > + * "refs/". We emulate the same behaviour here and thus skip > > > + * all references that don't start with this prefix. > > > + */ > > > + if (!starts_with(iter->ref.refname, "refs/")) > > > + continue; > > > + > > > > Since my patch series [1] to print all refs is now merged to next, maybe > > you could add this in? > > > > diff --git a/refs/reftable-backend.c b/refs/reftable-backend.c > > index 895de0b273..3f4f905292 100644 > > --- a/refs/reftable-backend.c > > +++ b/refs/reftable-backend.c > > @@ -348,11 +348,10 @@ static int > > reftable_ref_iterator_advance(struct ref_iterator *ref_iterator) > > break; > > > > /* > > - * The files backend only lists references contained in > > - * "refs/". We emulate the same behaviour here and thus skip > > - * all references that don't start with this prefix. > > + * Unless the `DO_FOR_EACH_INCLUDE_ALL_REFS` flag is use, we only > > + * list references contained in "refs/" to mimic the file-backend. > > */ > > - if (!starts_with(iter->ref.refname, "refs/")) > > + if (!(iter->flags & DO_FOR_EACH_INCLUDE_ALL_REFS) && > > !starts_with(iter->ref.refname, "refs/")) > > continue; > > > > if (iter->prefix && > > I'm still waiting for your patch series to hit `next` before making it a > dependency of this series, but thanks for the patch! Oops, didn't read this carefully enough and missed that it already is in `next`. I'll adapt accordingly in the next version, thanks! Patrick