Re: [PATCH v4 00/17] bloom: changed-path Bloom filters v2 (& sundries)

[Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>]

On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 04:26:48PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> writes:
>
> > (Rebased onto the tip of 'master', which is 3a06386e31 (The fifteenth
> > batch, 2023-10-04), at the time of writing).
>
> Judging from 17/17 that has a free_commit_graph() call in
> close_commit_graph(), that was merged in the eighteenth batch,
> the above is probably untrue.  I'll apply to the current master and
> see how it goes instead.

Worse than that, I sent this `--in-reply-to` the wrong thread :-<.

Sorry about that, and indeed you are right that the correct base for
this round should be a9ecda2788 (The eighteenth batch, 2023-10-13).

I'm optimistic that with the amount of careful review that this topic
has already received, that this round should do the trick. But if there
are more comments and we end up re-rolling it, I'll break this thread
and split out the v5 into it's thread to avoid further confusion.

> > Thanks to Jonathan, Peff, and SZEDER who have helped a great deal in
> > assembling these patches. As usual, a range-diff is included below.
> > Thanks in advance for your
> > review!
>
> Thanks.

Thank you, and sorry for the mistake on my end.

Thanks,
Taylor