From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.4 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::1:20]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A66E1F406 for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2023 06:16:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S240020AbjHXGPe (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Aug 2023 02:15:34 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:45964 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S240038AbjHXGPH (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Aug 2023 02:15:07 -0400 Received: from bluemchen.kde.org (bluemchen.kde.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:8::100]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9E6B170C for ; Wed, 23 Aug 2023 23:14:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ugly.fritz.box (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bluemchen.kde.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69529241CA; Thu, 24 Aug 2023 02:14:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: by ugly.fritz.box (masqmail 0.3.6-dev, from userid 1000) id 1qZ3cE-AcW-00; Thu, 24 Aug 2023 08:14:46 +0200 Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2023 08:14:46 +0200 From: Oswald Buddenhagen To: Junio C Hamano Cc: Taylor Blau , git@vger.kernel.org, Kristoffer Haugsbakk , Phillip Wood Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] sequencer: beautify subject of reverts of reverts Message-ID: References: <20230809171531.2564807-1-oswald.buddenhagen@gmx.de> <20230821170720.577850-1-oswald.buddenhagen@gmx.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 02:38:36PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: >Taylor Blau writes: > >> This version is looking good. The main functionality is well-reasoned >> and straightforwardly implemented. One minor suggestion that you could >> consider squashing in is some test clean-up like so: >> > >Yeah it does make the test more concise and what is expected stand >out more clearly. Good suggestion. > agreed. do you want to squash it on your end, or should i reroll? regards