On Wed, Apr 05, 2023 at 08:35:50AM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 5, 2023 at 5:53 AM Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> wrote:
> >
> > The majority of Perl scripts we carry in Git have a `#!/usr/bin/perl`
> > shebang. This is not a portable location for the Perl interpreter and
> > may thus break on some systems that have the interpreter installed in a
> > different location. One such example is NixOS, where the only executable
> > installed in `/usr/bin` is env(1).
> >
> > Convert the shebangs to resolve the location of the Perl interpreter via
> > env(1) to make these scripts more portable. While the location of env(1)
> > is not guaranteed by any standard either, in practice all distributions
> > including NixOS have it available at `/usr/bin/env`. We're also already
> > using this idiom in a small set of other scripts, and until now nobody
> > complained about them.
> 
> This is standard practice in Ruby, and it does seem to work everywhere.
> 
> However, I wonder if /bin/env does also work. I can't imagine a system
> system providing /usr/bin/env but not /bin/env.

NixOS does indeed only have /usr/bin/env and does not have /bin/env, so
it wouldn't.

Patrick