From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::1:20]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A3521F428 for ; Sat, 25 Mar 2023 08:06:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230043AbjCYIGH (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Mar 2023 04:06:07 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:47816 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229481AbjCYIGG (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Mar 2023 04:06:06 -0400 Received: from bluemchen.kde.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:142:8::100]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD1EF12841 for ; Sat, 25 Mar 2023 01:06:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ugly.fritz.box (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bluemchen.kde.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB0B124330 for ; Sat, 25 Mar 2023 04:05:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: by ugly.fritz.box (masqmail 0.3.4, from userid 1000) id 1pfyuK-Yh6-00 for ; Sat, 25 Mar 2023 09:05:48 +0100 Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2023 09:05:48 +0100 From: Oswald Buddenhagen To: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: limiting git branch --contains Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: git@vger.kernel.org References: <594a358e-7bd4-e7a1-ad0f-7e41ca1fe767@github.com> <85f81579-5876-a573-6d35-88b35ab0f290@github.com> <20230324191302.GB536967@coredump.intra.peff.net> <20230324204504.GB549549@coredump.intra.peff.net> <20230325063035.GA562387@coredump.intra.peff.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230325063035.GA562387@coredump.intra.peff.net> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Mar 25, 2023 at 02:30:35AM -0400, Jeff King wrote: > Nobody has yet; you could be that someone. ;) > damn ;) >I do think there might be some complications, though. I think we may >build commit graphs by default these days during "gc" and even >incrementally after "fetch". If we warned when the graphs are disabled, >it basically means that every command in a repo with replace refs would >issue the warning. > yeah, i thought about that, too ... it would be easy enough to squelch the warning by manually disabling writing or using the graph. the downside is that if the root cause gets fixed, the user would be still missing out (unless they read the changelog and remembered to reconfigure all affected repos). one could make it an advisory message which can be explictly squelched.