From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::1:20]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6A0B1F428 for ; Fri, 24 Mar 2023 19:03:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229729AbjCXTDM (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Mar 2023 15:03:12 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:47444 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229441AbjCXTDK (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Mar 2023 15:03:10 -0400 Received: from bluemchen.kde.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:142:8::100]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97BAD9773 for ; Fri, 24 Mar 2023 12:03:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ugly.fritz.box (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bluemchen.kde.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90621242DD for ; Fri, 24 Mar 2023 15:02:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: by ugly.fritz.box (masqmail 0.3.4, from userid 1000) id 1pfmgf-SJA-00 for ; Fri, 24 Mar 2023 20:02:53 +0100 Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2023 20:02:53 +0100 From: Oswald Buddenhagen To: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: limiting git branch --contains Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: git@vger.kernel.org References: <594a358e-7bd4-e7a1-ad0f-7e41ca1fe767@github.com> <85f81579-5876-a573-6d35-88b35ab0f290@github.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <85f81579-5876-a573-6d35-88b35ab0f290@github.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 02:20:01PM -0400, Derrick Stolee wrote: >Hm. The point is that it _should_ improve things by several orders >of magnitude [...] > well, at that point it would be kinda sufficient. ^^ but it really doesn't do anything at all (i tried moving away the graph for comparison). maybe the operation just forgets to load the graph? >But what you were originally asking was also about filtering the >set of branches to pick, > i didn't, i was just misunderstood.