From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS3215 2.6.0.0/16 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::1:20]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89EFA1F506 for ; Fri, 23 Sep 2022 18:29:41 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: dcvr.yhbt.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ttaylorr-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com header.i=@ttaylorr-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com header.b="TAGpqDx4"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232807AbiIWS3i (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Sep 2022 14:29:38 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50306 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232833AbiIWS3g (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Sep 2022 14:29:36 -0400 Received: from mail-io1-xd31.google.com (mail-io1-xd31.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d31]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4AE410F3 for ; Fri, 23 Sep 2022 11:29:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-io1-xd31.google.com with SMTP id d8so577307iof.11 for ; Fri, 23 Sep 2022 11:29:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ttaylorr-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=C0XOvG4wiCzbUtxS6pzjMyUMwG0J2+Chhmxv4KxoS3A=; b=TAGpqDx4mEe5e6O4bQSCWu6goV7g3GZwKyJco1PgrKcHWSwmfSJzbrRftU40iJ0DUD mY+q0Nl+waZTsv1mD6PAroJ6fawvggcsRcsWjrl4oVG6npuLTeBeg2C/FGmfeJFRgc70 2B8fjOBgA5IxN/Bd9t8V562ZvUE6UOtiwGUsvrLkmu24KG17YgItAXDh2bqZuuk//VRi 0JQPCmIr4zseSoGuypUvSCz26lRrZn6uVUraFu7CwHoQnHdW2VmeZXN94YsaYsdihToM I9We8USYGTQGPkkRMv8f43pXOH9xtlQYbfBunq4jaNha5BnKbZg++Wf4nQnILsbvJ3ZK o5lw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=C0XOvG4wiCzbUtxS6pzjMyUMwG0J2+Chhmxv4KxoS3A=; b=QqteG6AcXA5NW/Dq0q8rhMEmbdxuzHSjjAJimyHWNWRTHeCoqEdy2wGqnr/NkB7PBx dqsAMB0KT8nPRoV+UBxtwXXFmGlUisZ92uJhOLHVu2fK4u/E5kis+ZvKX18DHBjNFZeS 2tZUgAgZ4qf9PoqhuTx2WA6d/CJTsZY1eCnUHDHhhAoFCrjow1+bnbkhyZ/SwLeA1rmJ RPI7sr8mRSnL9SWf0nMOn4J8Ew5p3wkJsUh6xZzKvWkrvDSPUJJaE5cyXaRx8eDwPqBG dlPx6OsEBr39flcoR/rL8d5akN6FxX2SIOkfO4Rw4ZUiApmjNPtm2WshiIaV/zF8Aljm BO0A== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf0bxC3F2/OvatVGryC967afdm1j2dvZwlp531Vz6k0EJ1XKKeRX uagFdzHUV2EhLH1yy5zJyhBe0Q== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM66m+kOED6u8CjxFwu5yS7mpfDKSzj5yUgodM0P4FIx/6eET4srLOXK0J8gjkIbvOEekQ6XBg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6638:1487:b0:35a:ba3d:ba16 with SMTP id j7-20020a056638148700b0035aba3dba16mr5477126jak.188.1663957773056; Fri, 23 Sep 2022 11:29:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (104-178-186-189.lightspeed.milwwi.sbcglobal.net. [104.178.186.189]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id bm4-20020a05663842c400b0034294118e1bsm3658580jab.126.2022.09.23.11.29.32 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 23 Sep 2022 11:29:32 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2022 14:29:31 -0400 From: Taylor Blau To: Junio C Hamano Cc: Taylor Blau , git@vger.kernel.org, derrickstolee@github.com, peff@peff.net Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] midx: use `--stdin-packs` to implement `repack` Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 12:09:31PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Taylor Blau writes: > > > Here's a few patches that replace the existing "feed each OID > > one-by-one" approach to implement the `repack` sub-command of the > > `multi-pack-index` builtin with one that uses `pack-objects`'s > > `--stdin-packs` option. > > One question. How is this series expected to interact with the > 7-patch series about ignoring cruft pack while "midx repack" etc.? The first round merges cleanly, but the second round will have a slight conflict. I'll send you a new version of this series based on whatever is in `master` following the release. Thanks, Taylor