From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS3215 2.6.0.0/16 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.4 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::1:20]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0FEF1F727 for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2022 21:52:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: dcvr.yhbt.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ttaylorr-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com header.i=@ttaylorr-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com header.b="wiEy8leL"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S238508AbiF0VvB (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Jun 2022 17:51:01 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:55064 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S241229AbiF0Vuu (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Jun 2022 17:50:50 -0400 Received: from mail-qk1-x72d.google.com (mail-qk1-x72d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72d]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2DD762F0 for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2022 14:50:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-qk1-x72d.google.com with SMTP id n10so4897037qkn.10 for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2022 14:50:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ttaylorr-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=CSkug/uqw8iQtoZguG8yAaz6e/BUj5MnS5jowyv4ciE=; b=wiEy8leLtyiJj8UPcibmaeXvMHv2uDgATenGgMvSQIyXEFK2m7DlT5NFBHl77Y8UyY A97dRfh0EUC1JsILk5Nw0rQJTyy2Q/8QHBPuZlZTmQH+XkZ1woKxUepLdFu/HZgNqkcS tO4jKgQgf0q721vhhcH9FZs+gzH+ZUVrR/nwXi9QfPk4puBYmAcgMdhF2SVwIFmMQuAR 7EHXzpAFKKP43llzMK4TpafWP0R3VAnlIsFVCeEZSGo9IUSPEZ79OLXGK150r84ecyi8 RRflCHJW10eu3kpIigacliXJyWe/QAl6chkMEXYCa7zqYF1LBsn7IsGbxWfIVS8y6lrE EAEA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=CSkug/uqw8iQtoZguG8yAaz6e/BUj5MnS5jowyv4ciE=; b=0DsqEtV2QM4PprhugqVnRv6PuYzm2LDShi0fFur4OdzrmenkXW+ZIZO7pH5IC9UKin ycB1hERwxZU7jk1IDnh50V85ADwB5MhXDzJuLfYrNF7XL8Md4uiDP/hbNkTWh+rJ3L2U dESxITxA+hvczHL1eaPm8thnM1f56ITDpqu5lm3lUsJQd50XSgLZ74kEzwEbS2thP/lk 82kxmQwm6eT79b1rLO11suvMziKs8yRmHi8PN2UwjIjbE9mFUCcWqOV5ilWQPsp56Dg1 UM1LfgzdHNgIkUmy74jX/sok8oExUatXEeQVlXsRJduxdgOqL40+xczCw4RIxsB6KSB8 jblg== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora/3WWswK0ohNxN7567FiotQBhdMQmk1ZaJwnWR7IgO/+AegSEit 1IPDZMMwb94K8vlfMPzy1RTlvA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1uRRAh2TBcUYmkBKoQKQNsP7nWget5aKCLdAEXCWA0CX0OXJSX12UNuv/GlF9hfY6u7B3xtdg== X-Received: by 2002:a37:4454:0:b0:69f:c339:e2dc with SMTP id r81-20020a374454000000b0069fc339e2dcmr9358475qka.771.1656366648888; Mon, 27 Jun 2022 14:50:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (104-178-186-189.lightspeed.milwwi.sbcglobal.net. [104.178.186.189]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f11-20020a05620a408b00b006a74458410csm3903161qko.123.2022.06.27.14.50.48 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 27 Jun 2022 14:50:48 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2022 17:50:47 -0400 From: Taylor Blau To: Abhradeep Chakraborty via GitGitGadget Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Kaartic Sivaram , Derrick Stolee , Abhradeep Chakraborty Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] p5310-pack-bitmaps.sh: enable pack.writeReverseIndex for testing Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jun 26, 2022 at 01:10:17PM +0000, Abhradeep Chakraborty via GitGitGadget wrote: > From: Abhradeep Chakraborty > > Enable pack.writeReverseIndex to true to see the effect of writing > the reverse index in the existing bitmap tests (with and without > lookup table). I think we should swap the order of these final two patches, since we're primarily interested in the difference between using a reverse index with and without the lookup table. Thanks, Taylor