From: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
To: Matt Cooper via GitGitGadget <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, gitster@pobox.com, me@ttaylorr.com,
derrickstolee@github.com, Matt Cooper <vtbassmatt@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Specify the actual pack size limit which is breached
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2022 11:33:00 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YhZhvPcdD/C/LSMP@nand.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <pull.1158.git.1645632193.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 04:03:11PM +0000, Matt Cooper via GitGitGadget wrote:
> Matt Cooper (2):
> index-pack: clarify the breached limit
> t5302: confirm that large packs mention limit
>
> builtin/index-pack.c | 8 ++++++--
> t/t5302-pack-index.sh | 8 ++++++++
> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
I took a look and reviewed this series internally. The patches here
match what I looked at within GitHub, so these look good to me also.
For what it's worth, I wouldn't mind to see these two patches squashed
together, since it may be easier for future readers to see the new code
and test together in the same patch.
But I don't feel strongly about it, so (with or without that suggestion)
I'd be happy to see this get picked up. Thanks, Matt!
Thanks,
Taylor
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-23 16:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-23 16:03 [PATCH 0/2] Specify the actual pack size limit which is breached Matt Cooper via GitGitGadget
2022-02-23 16:03 ` [PATCH 1/2] index-pack: clarify the breached limit Matt Cooper via GitGitGadget
2022-02-23 16:03 ` [PATCH 2/2] t5302: confirm that large packs mention limit Matt Cooper via GitGitGadget
2022-02-23 17:22 ` Taylor Blau
2022-02-23 23:26 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-02-23 23:41 ` Taylor Blau
2022-02-23 16:33 ` Taylor Blau [this message]
2022-02-24 0:07 ` [PATCH v2] index-pack: clarify the breached limit Matt Cooper via GitGitGadget
2022-02-24 0:14 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YhZhvPcdD/C/LSMP@nand.local \
--to=me@ttaylorr.com \
--cc=derrickstolee@github.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=vtbassmatt@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).