From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-ASN: AS3215 2.6.0.0/16 X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.2 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,LIST_MIRROR_RECEIVED, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE shortcircuit=no autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::1:20]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27EAA1F670 for ; Sun, 20 Feb 2022 22:42:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S245181AbiBTWl7 (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Feb 2022 17:41:59 -0500 Received: from mxb-00190b01.gslb.pphosted.com ([23.128.96.19]:49930 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S245176AbiBTWl5 (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Feb 2022 17:41:57 -0500 Received: from mail-il1-x135.google.com (mail-il1-x135.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::135]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93E91108D for ; Sun, 20 Feb 2022 14:41:35 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-il1-x135.google.com with SMTP id v3so3434953ilc.7 for ; Sun, 20 Feb 2022 14:41:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ttaylorr-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=dDu1Cfi7dmh4s0pQ9QrkvucS7dNgGSm8Gu7vaP8gNAw=; b=ZUEEjs8OUfmYevNPNx9oMlfbwJlKglEb/1wHR98WGfuxnNBGhySFKU0L1FmrBhl9WO eTeyTC+iJ+GfAoFY67MiXSpL95Q+QwTtTdaFtZzQJILySjoKX0fToAhQpC+rz3MJ3CCt 3feKpMAxZLcZGB4EGVkFDzQe9Y18QKRAbCb1V4UXIVbM6jogNzxMkMMl9F+z6DEAOFbc QBtg8B9UkNTPL87hHFNZcx2MtLmMoeX2TswjI33eJaDrHUEiY1je/XZ5a7u+5n6Dklki 2ZLzj6GzkQnUPHyt3XbyTB8BMEkRSEsuvHurpdyXHKH6bHeY6t6Ij9CXdx6VCyDhFWcO MLnQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=dDu1Cfi7dmh4s0pQ9QrkvucS7dNgGSm8Gu7vaP8gNAw=; b=DIASiY8wBF9l3BXXl1Er4Mpz6m9HCfUjh7foDeR0i2d0uo2akP8UBmCMukTwgrg+QD gJ3p7bQhCWzXegGPSOLXDEVss9Q7SCcF3/81o1JoIc8CSiHDd/oO0uYa2K+SGAo3oNul qHiGYhMETXMC1n30c6w3gRtrylSXKZkKEhy9g5FRG1/KNyWFJn8fmU6unjBbF8s3Twx2 nqMEJZnGu2WdWS4rRxPRA4iD/8yZoLvJLOAsdM4b5TvuZ9wMpyespV6ZLgdvx1jBIVE9 AYTTZHRwbwlhsWQDoLJsKXggUwLiUeYMHGdJxZEoeGefPvP+dJ6T1zkBCmO16FNIrl9N ID/Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533iXZqRQ3eGA3VSpx0N+HVresaN6ZWTmH0oAt6tgZ9WRv8UPIsr ivebbx/9WWmNznyfkoDXlU36sQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz+zVj9JN+AbFy48yJqHaQFl62wlmP2dnnz016k0n1PhLnpuWnWtonQjQ9VL82Hz4sqRcMXzw== X-Received: by 2002:a92:3314:0:b0:2bc:8054:9780 with SMTP id a20-20020a923314000000b002bc80549780mr12632995ilf.12.1645396895044; Sun, 20 Feb 2022 14:41:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (104-178-186-189.lightspeed.milwwi.sbcglobal.net. [104.178.186.189]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m11sm2384398ilg.53.2022.02.20.14.41.34 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 20 Feb 2022 14:41:34 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2022 17:41:34 -0500 From: Taylor Blau Cc: Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget , Junio C Hamano , Eric Sunshine , =?utf-8?Q?Jean-No=C3=ABl?= AVILA , Elijah Newren , git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] Updates to worktree code and docs Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Feb 20, 2022 at 05:38:20PM -0500, Taylor Blau wrote: > On Sun, Feb 20, 2022 at 05:54:16PM +0000, Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget wrote: > > This is built on top of ds/sparse-checkout-requires-per-worktree-config and > > includes some forward fixes for comments from that series. > > Thanks, I took a careful look through these and they all mostly look > good to me. > > I left a couple of small notes throughout, but I wouldn't be sad if you > ignored any or all of them (though see my notes on the very last patch, > where I think you replaced one too many instances of "working tree"). In this (and a handful of other replies), my 'group-reply' macro was too eager to drop any entries in the Cc list that it couldn't parse, so a handful of recipients got dropped. That's fine, since nothing in any of those messages was critical in terms of reaching those individuals, but they are CC'd here just in case. Thanks, Taylor