From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS53758 23.128.96.0/24 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2A671F852 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2022 21:27:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1381041AbiAaV1G (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Jan 2022 16:27:06 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:48970 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S240178AbiAaV05 (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Jan 2022 16:26:57 -0500 Received: from mail-il1-x130.google.com (mail-il1-x130.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::130]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2915C061714 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2022 13:26:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-il1-x130.google.com with SMTP id q11so4433190ild.11 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2022 13:26:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ttaylorr-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=09ZVxkbgCxvUSCuf0BKATojgh/slW83XJcSvwnLFCZY=; b=1RUJlWwCmwUjPP0p8RnxykgOqHFR92/m7HNnDtFHtp7l7pDxqtcCp7OOC8RH+Kgmdy 0oI2H81Q8/zzYT6cxpWA8eF/spz5gsC3ZsM1APn6WTnnheK3jiICQ0aFBfitWOH4Pc2O aVTKSOJ547LYhPL6RYrbn+BHL/613QbPP+8D9lJZacJ5EBiFnNFHOWgiZrMWTCA8tCHA gEv6b5auk82lOeXcrY80jPq7eZrrSbK7E5gTTg0Xsgt25+wGv9l2m9a6dSDWTKPLauA2 sTuTeF0cW22Vrvi9FHMTtpRCq7uPoXeF3Q5HVdfnipT/osyQlopXExm+vDks3R1pUXxw FFtw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=09ZVxkbgCxvUSCuf0BKATojgh/slW83XJcSvwnLFCZY=; b=1WljQTRw4W360xUk9TmytInIYdvsUj8adxrKmv/qcvJ+F/ikpLPoaHSrPAFuWCsWlY WnESRms2sOBrXNnG9oHUWisxDC19TCl++b4Rg3rWwEtd3ohetdbz8fkT+/ItyFfRNBPW KRjF9QjdhN43SJAy6hn5GdEEOU3tBYsrhtjw1G9Pp/yMXZyuOrgsT+Qx8XdzqWaaqweA DTkjw7Ity+VKvpQlzPvYc44jLlxzFNNdKMESLxC2ffwCwviVLGts3lip8jmuuSX6ANJG X2AJYefJL6+vnwh7mY3zu1XEMnyn07s7Q0VX8WKdwlaMsvuYeivof9ILfDqdmAzpyAWy BwyQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532fgXiZkmvPcSOeI634GfcSQiukm7YKrDwkp7FCReKnB6pQ6LKu HZa3onaq6/oDrAZ8e05LmrLmRw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz1SLp9crW7MIFPQZjDypPk3XiuCzNUYShmUQJkZMEyxOsqTsdYJiawow9vDxQJNgQYOT8E0w== X-Received: by 2002:a92:6c07:: with SMTP id h7mr13693055ilc.118.1643664417254; Mon, 31 Jan 2022 13:26:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (104-178-186-189.lightspeed.milwwi.sbcglobal.net. [104.178.186.189]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y19sm3820239ilq.60.2022.01.31.13.26.56 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 31 Jan 2022 13:26:57 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2022 16:26:56 -0500 From: Taylor Blau To: Han-Wen Nienhuys via GitGitGadget Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Han-Wen Nienhuys , Han-Wen Nienhuys Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] t1405: mark test that checks existence as REFFILES Message-ID: References: <1ded69d89709d23147b29f67122b659293414405.1643651420.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1ded69d89709d23147b29f67122b659293414405.1643651420.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 05:50:19PM +0000, Han-Wen Nienhuys via GitGitGadget wrote: > From: Han-Wen Nienhuys > > The reftable backend doesn't support mere existence of reflogs. Perhaps I'm missing something obvious, but this and the previous patch seem to be conflicting each other. My understanding of the previous change is that you wanted a reflog entry when the REFFILES prerequisite isn't met. But this patch says what matches my understanding is that reftable and reflogs do not play together. If reflogs do not interact with the reftable backend, then what does this patch do? Thanks, Taylor