From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS53758 23.128.96.0/24 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CE541F953 for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2021 14:57:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233278AbhKEPAU (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Nov 2021 11:00:20 -0400 Received: from kitenet.net ([66.228.36.95]:50518 "EHLO kitenet.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229680AbhKEPAT (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Nov 2021 11:00:19 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=joeyh.name; s=mail; t=1636124246; bh=vOH/vLu1sn3OGk/8q6bNwSGlVrCo6oSzVTW28DDzvb4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Ks6+u5flK7WI5rWBOWxZMQ7jYgPeJCMwwgTrv1LbJ7hEKjBd8tTHVKgM2ENw92rNx D2r1TYpX7MAOsPESl8WVr/3COhVOIkIYaY02EdAVlDt1kAND4Mztk00i4bR/YM1dMD pnZrmGpE4csqeQHMNDZ5HGoW5oxXz+g5/dqEHv/U= X-Question: 42 Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2021 10:57:26 -0400 From: Joey Hess To: Matheus Tavares Cc: git Subject: Re: surprising value of LARGE_PACKET_MAX Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="N1xWPjUN6RwJ6eI/" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org --N1xWPjUN6RwJ6eI/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Matheus Tavares wrote: > Could it be that you consulted an older version of this file? The > current [1] version of the doc says: >=20 > "The maximum length of a pkt-line's data component is 65516 bytes. > Implementations MUST NOT send pkt-line whose length exceeds 65520 > (65516 bytes of payload + 4 bytes of length data)." I'm sure I did read the current version, so I think I must have glanced at 65516 and seen 65535. I don't see FFFF in decimal very often. I think FFF0 would have stood out better to me, but still the current docs are ok. --=20 see shy jo --N1xWPjUN6RwJ6eI/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEKKUAw1IH6rcvbA8l2xLbD/BfjzgFAmGFRlYACgkQ2xLbD/Bf jzjClA/+IdRy0tKkzZDxYlGAqEVhOBSbCBpx/NfvFgq9X8c6GWJ6+DB++Ah56Uyt 6sCuH0U8OyiTYPtj7ljWYKvWHHF57gO0I739zshcX5bDXLF+0eNbDhj6QU7fn6yA XUTqnEawTBxzDx0H9ry54O6ipthHYlw5AYj7G4UszOVBxt8auoqc2+Vg+lyEhKnj FNomPS/pdk239Z7oJm9HIozPs3rnXQW7r9ELdapAdIMnAZiOLn25aHPg1lcRGqnZ 17NbphLblU8RHgKLFUw8nBaNT+XGvvVtZAXe37NKsWUfhRr4i7wIqQ5aUXclDKAl O5IBHm86Xtygc1Axeg5eZQr6133t/eWRsXbhd9q4lyC+rxlxCdpCQeH8cn3sS67n DXJ/UW2BjVSkSY941Q0tRSmiyIHjFhBfoLftzn6uAgvVMrWiuVWPsKT3vvslw9jf J8/8DxFzFnZcgXIZ+rKaQZ7mhaAqjGuzwz7WA2Lpj4HhvADnKP22Zr+oNSOL9HkT YbkFnHM9izBHTsJP6W/6Llon4QvEy3T+aywbgZ5tdyQPzZx8v9EqhqCTkb8BNdft h+aCMkrWa8SdwWWYjUwjx8t54kYbbgEfKXEHMfnpZGoZCof0k7hIwtQeiIAfNu5k 5T6X673uMKkNJ3KBvyzAS8GlV8SuXpwIqit7DMi3VSCzBDGv1m8= =ouna -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --N1xWPjUN6RwJ6eI/--