git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, "Jeff King" <peff@peff.net>,
	"Felipe Contreras" <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>,
	"SZEDER Gábor" <szeder.dev@gmail.com>,
	"Chris Torek" <chris.torek@gmail.com>,
	"Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <avarab@gmail.com>,
	"Taylor Blau" <me@ttaylorr.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] connected: do not sort input revisions
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2021 10:55:17 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YQkEdYi/7vrS9ydC@ncase> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqa6lzwu31.fsf@gitster.g>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1867 bytes --]

On Mon, Aug 02, 2021 at 12:00:02PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> writes:
[snip]
> > Introduce a new "--unsorted-input" flag to git-rev-list(1) which will
> > cause it to not sort the commits and adjust the connectivity check to
> > always pass the flag. This results in the following speedups, executed
> > in a clone of gitlab-org/gitlab [1]:
> > ...
> > [1]: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab.git. Note that not all refs
> >      are visible to clients.
> 
> So is this the 2.2 million refs thing?

Yeah, it is. The repo itself got 2.2 million refs, even though only 800k
are publicly visible. It got even more when one considers its alternate,
where it grows to 3.4 million in total.

> > @@ -3584,7 +3586,7 @@ int prepare_revision_walk(struct rev_info *revs)
> >  
> >  	if (!revs->reflog_info)
> >  		prepare_to_use_bloom_filter(revs);
> > -	if (revs->no_walk != REVISION_WALK_NO_WALK_UNSORTED)
> > +	if (revs->no_walk != REVISION_WALK_NO_WALK_UNSORTED && !revs->unsorted_input)
> >  		commit_list_sort_by_date(&revs->commits);
> 
> Looks quite straight-forward.
> 
> I however suspect that in the longer term it may be cleaner to get
> rid of REVSISION_WALK_NO_WALK_UNSORTED if we do this.  The knob that
> controls if we sort the initial traversal tips and the knob that
> controls if we walk from these tips used to be tied to --no-walk
> only because ca92e59e30b wanted to affect only no-walk case, but
> with your new finding, it clearly is not limited to the no-walk case
> to want to avoid sorting.

Right. The question also is what to do when the user calls `git rev-list
--no-walk=sorted --unsorted-input`. Do we sort? Don't we? Should we mark
these options as incompatible with each other and bail out? I guess just
bailing out would be the easiest solution for now.

Patrick

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2021-08-03  8:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-28  5:33 [PATCH v2 0/3] Speed up connectivity checks via bitmaps Patrick Steinhardt
2021-06-28  5:33 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] p5400: add perf tests for git-receive-pack(1) Patrick Steinhardt
2021-06-28  7:49   ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-06-29  6:18     ` Patrick Steinhardt
2021-06-29 12:09       ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-06-28  5:33 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] receive-pack: skip connectivity checks on delete-only commands Patrick Steinhardt
2021-06-28  8:00   ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-06-28  8:06     ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-06-29  6:26     ` Patrick Steinhardt
2021-06-30  1:31   ` Jeff King
2021-06-30  1:35     ` Jeff King
2021-06-30 13:52     ` Patrick Steinhardt
2021-06-28  5:33 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] connected: implement connectivity check using bitmaps Patrick Steinhardt
2021-06-28 20:23   ` Taylor Blau
2021-06-29 22:44     ` Taylor Blau
2021-06-30  2:04       ` Jeff King
2021-06-30  3:07         ` Taylor Blau
2021-06-30  5:45           ` Jeff King
2021-07-02 17:44             ` Taylor Blau
2021-07-02 21:21               ` Jeff King
2021-06-30  1:51   ` Jeff King
2021-07-20 14:26     ` Patrick Steinhardt
2021-08-02  9:37 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] Speed up connectivity checks Patrick Steinhardt
2021-08-02  9:38   ` [PATCH v3 1/4] connected: do not sort input revisions Patrick Steinhardt
2021-08-02 12:49     ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-08-03  8:50       ` Patrick Steinhardt
2021-08-04 11:01         ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-08-02 19:00     ` Junio C Hamano
2021-08-03  8:55       ` Patrick Steinhardt [this message]
2021-08-03 21:47         ` Junio C Hamano
2021-08-02  9:38   ` [PATCH v3 2/4] revision: stop retrieving reference twice Patrick Steinhardt
2021-08-02 12:53     ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-08-02  9:38   ` [PATCH v3 3/4] revision: avoid loading object headers multiple times Patrick Steinhardt
2021-08-02 12:55     ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-08-05 10:12       ` Patrick Steinhardt
2021-08-02 19:40     ` Junio C Hamano
2021-08-03  9:07       ` Patrick Steinhardt
2021-08-06 14:17         ` Patrick Steinhardt
2021-08-02  9:38   ` [PATCH v3 4/4] revision: avoid hitting packfiles when commits are in commit-graph Patrick Steinhardt
2021-08-02 20:01     ` Junio C Hamano
2021-08-03  9:16       ` Patrick Steinhardt
2021-08-03 21:56         ` Junio C Hamano
2021-08-05 11:01           ` Patrick Steinhardt
2021-08-05 16:16             ` Junio C Hamano
2021-08-04 10:51         ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-08-05 11:25   ` [PATCH v4 0/6] Speed up connectivity checks Patrick Steinhardt
2021-08-05 11:25     ` [PATCH v4 1/6] revision: separate walk and unsorted flags Patrick Steinhardt
2021-08-05 18:47       ` Junio C Hamano
2021-08-05 11:25     ` [PATCH v4 2/6] connected: do not sort input revisions Patrick Steinhardt
2021-08-05 18:44       ` Junio C Hamano
2021-08-06  6:00         ` Patrick Steinhardt
2021-08-06 16:50           ` Junio C Hamano
2021-08-05 11:25     ` [PATCH v4 3/6] revision: stop retrieving reference twice Patrick Steinhardt
2021-08-05 11:25     ` [PATCH v4 4/6] revision: avoid loading object headers multiple times Patrick Steinhardt
2021-08-05 11:25     ` [PATCH v4 5/6] commit-graph: split out function to search commit position Patrick Steinhardt
2021-08-05 11:25     ` [PATCH v4 6/6] revision: avoid hitting packfiles when commits are in commit-graph Patrick Steinhardt
2021-08-09  8:00 ` [PATCH v5 0/5] Speed up connectivity checks Patrick Steinhardt
2021-08-09  8:02   ` Patrick Steinhardt
2021-08-09  8:11 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2021-08-09  8:11   ` [PATCH v5 1/5] revision: separate walk and unsorted flags Patrick Steinhardt
2021-08-09  8:11   ` [PATCH v5 2/5] connected: do not sort input revisions Patrick Steinhardt
2021-08-09  8:11   ` [PATCH v5 3/5] revision: stop retrieving reference twice Patrick Steinhardt
2021-08-09  8:11   ` [PATCH v5 4/5] commit-graph: split out function to search commit position Patrick Steinhardt
2021-08-09  8:12   ` [PATCH v5 5/5] revision: avoid hitting packfiles when commits are in commit-graph Patrick Steinhardt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YQkEdYi/7vrS9ydC@ncase \
    --to=ps@pks.im \
    --cc=avarab@gmail.com \
    --cc=chris.torek@gmail.com \
    --cc=felipe.contreras@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=me@ttaylorr.com \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=szeder.dev@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).