From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, dstolee@microsoft.com, gitster@pobox.com,
jonathantanmy@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 13/24] pack-bitmap: read multi-pack bitmaps
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 07:32:49 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YPgF4X2PeFvBuJXm@coredump.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7d44ba6299c06c956d5ac8ba01a0288d109c3cae.1624314293.git.me@ttaylorr.com>
On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 06:25:31PM -0400, Taylor Blau wrote:
> This prepares the code in pack-bitmap to interpret the new multi-pack
> bitmaps described in Documentation/technical/bitmap-format.txt, which
> mostly involves converting bit positions to accommodate looking them up
> in a MIDX.
>
> Note that there are currently no writers who write multi-pack bitmaps,
> and that this will be implemented in the subsequent commit.
There's quite a lot going on in this one, of course, but most of it
looks right. A few hunks did puzzle me:
> @@ -302,12 +377,18 @@ static int open_pack_bitmap_1(struct bitmap_index *bitmap_git, struct packed_git
> return -1;
> }
>
> - if (bitmap_git->pack) {
> + if (bitmap_git->pack || bitmap_git->midx) {
> + /* ignore extra bitmap file; we can only handle one */
> warning("ignoring extra bitmap file: %s", packfile->pack_name);
> close(fd);
> return -1;
> }
>
> + if (!is_pack_valid(packfile)) {
> + close(fd);
> + return -1;
> + }
> +
What's this extra is_pack_valid() doing? I wouldn't expect many changes
at all to this non-midx code path (aside from the "did we already load a
midx bitmap" in the earlier part of the hunk, which makes sense).
> -static int load_pack_bitmap(struct bitmap_index *bitmap_git)
> +static int load_reverse_index(struct bitmap_index *bitmap_git)
> +{
> + if (bitmap_is_midx(bitmap_git)) {
> + uint32_t i;
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = load_midx_revindex(bitmap_git->midx);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < bitmap_git->midx->num_packs; i++) {
> + if (prepare_midx_pack(the_repository, bitmap_git->midx, i))
> + die(_("load_reverse_index: could not open pack"));
> + ret = load_pack_revindex(bitmap_git->midx->packs[i]);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + }
> + return 0;
> + }
> + return load_pack_revindex(bitmap_git->pack);
> +}
OK, this new function is used in load_bitmap(), which is used for both
pack and midx bitmaps. So if we have a midx bitmap, we'll
unconditionally load the revindex here. But:
- why do we then load individual pack revindexes? I can believe it may
be necessary to meet the assumptions of some other part of the code,
but it would be nice to have a comment giving us some clue.
- in open_midx_bitmap_1(), we also unconditionally load the midx
reverse index. I think that will always happen before us here (we
cannot load_bitmap() a bitmap that has not been opened). So is this
load_midx_revindex() call always a noop?
> +static int open_bitmap(struct repository *r,
> + struct bitmap_index *bitmap_git)
> +{
> + assert(!bitmap_git->map);
> +
> + if (!open_midx_bitmap(r, bitmap_git))
> + return 0;
> + return open_pack_bitmap(r, bitmap_git);
> +}
We always prefer a midx bitmap over a pack one. That makes sense, since
that means we can leave old pack bitmaps in place when generating midx
bitmaps, if we choose to.
> static int bitmap_position(struct bitmap_index *bitmap_git,
> const struct object_id *oid)
> {
> - int pos = bitmap_position_packfile(bitmap_git, oid);
> + int pos;
> + if (bitmap_is_midx(bitmap_git))
> + pos = bitmap_position_midx(bitmap_git, oid);
> + else
> + pos = bitmap_position_packfile(bitmap_git, oid);
> return (pos >= 0) ? pos : bitmap_position_extended(bitmap_git, oid);
> }
Makes sense. Not new in your patch, but this "int" return is fudging the
same 32-bit space we were talking about elsewhere (i.e., "pos" really
could be 2^32, or even more due to extended objects).
In practice I think even 2^31 objects is pretty out-of-reach, but it may
be worth changing the return type (and the callers), or even just
catching the overflow with an assertion.
> @@ -752,8 +911,13 @@ static int in_bitmapped_pack(struct bitmap_index *bitmap_git,
> struct object *object = roots->item;
> roots = roots->next;
>
> - if (find_pack_entry_one(object->oid.hash, bitmap_git->pack) > 0)
> - return 1;
> + if (bitmap_is_midx(bitmap_git)) {
> + if (bsearch_midx(&object->oid, bitmap_git->midx, NULL))
> + return 1;
> + } else {
> + if (find_pack_entry_one(object->oid.hash, bitmap_git->pack) > 0)
> + return 1;
> + }
> }
Makes sense. TBH, I am not sure this in_bitmapped_pack() function is all
that useful. It is used only as part of a heuristic to avoid bitmaps
when we don't have coverage of any "have" commits. But I'm not sure that
heuristic is actually useful.
Anyway, we should definitely not get into ripping it out here. This
series is complicated enough. :) Just a note for possible future work.
> if (pos < bitmap_num_objects(bitmap_git)) {
> - off_t ofs = pack_pos_to_offset(pack, pos);
> + struct packed_git *pack;
> + off_t ofs;
> +
> + if (bitmap_is_midx(bitmap_git)) {
> + uint32_t midx_pos = pack_pos_to_midx(bitmap_git->midx, pos);
> + uint32_t pack_id = nth_midxed_pack_int_id(bitmap_git->midx, midx_pos);
> +
> + pack = bitmap_git->midx->packs[pack_id];
> + ofs = nth_midxed_offset(bitmap_git->midx, midx_pos);
> + } else {
> + pack = bitmap_git->pack;
> + ofs = pack_pos_to_offset(pack, pos);
> + }
> +
All of the hunks like this make perfect sense. The big problem would be
if we _missed_ a place that needed conversion to handle midx. But the
nice thing is that it would segfault quickly in such an instance. So
there I'm mostly relying on test coverage, plus our experience running
with this code at scale.
> static void try_partial_reuse(struct bitmap_index *bitmap_git,
> + struct packed_git *pack,
> size_t pos,
> struct bitmap *reuse,
> struct pack_window **w_curs)
> {
> - off_t offset, header;
> + off_t offset, delta_obj_offset;
I'm OK with all of this in one big patch. But I suspect you _could_
just put:
if (bitmap_git->midx)
return; /* partial reuse not implemented for midx yet */
to start with, and then actually implement it later. I call out this
code in particular just because it's got a lot of subtleties (the
"reuse" bits are much more intimate with the assumptions of packs and
bitmaps than most other code).
I'm not sure if it's worth the trouble at this point or not.
> enum object_type type;
> unsigned long size;
>
> - if (pos >= bitmap_num_objects(bitmap_git))
> - return; /* not actually in the pack or MIDX */
> + /*
> + * try_partial_reuse() is called either on (a) objects in the
> + * bitmapped pack (in the case of a single-pack bitmap) or (b)
> + * objects in the preferred pack of a multi-pack bitmap.
> + * Importantly, the latter can pretend as if only a single pack
> + * exists because:
> + *
> + * - The first pack->num_objects bits of a MIDX bitmap are
> + * reserved for the preferred pack, and
> + *
> + * - Ties due to duplicate objects are always resolved in
> + * favor of the preferred pack.
> + *
> + * Therefore we do not need to ever ask the MIDX for its copy of
> + * an object by OID, since it will always select it from the
> + * preferred pack. Likewise, the selected copy of the base
> + * object for any deltas will reside in the same pack.
> + *
> + * This means that we can reuse pos when looking up the bit in
> + * the reuse bitmap, too, since bits corresponding to the
> + * preferred pack precede all bits from other packs.
> + */
>
> - offset = header = pack_pos_to_offset(bitmap_git->pack, pos);
> - type = unpack_object_header(bitmap_git->pack, w_curs, &offset, &size);
> + if (pos >= pack->num_objects)
> + return; /* not actually in the pack or MIDX preferred pack */
It feels weird to go from bitmap_num_objects() back to
pack->num_objects. But I agree it's the right thing for the "pretend as
if only a single pack exists" reasons given above.
> +static uint32_t midx_preferred_pack(struct bitmap_index *bitmap_git)
> +{
> + struct multi_pack_index *m = bitmap_git->midx;
> + if (!m)
> + BUG("midx_preferred_pack: requires non-empty MIDX");
> + return nth_midxed_pack_int_id(m, pack_pos_to_midx(bitmap_git->midx, 0));
> +}
This part is really subtle. We infer the preferred pack by looking at
the pack of the 0th bit position. In general that works, since that's
part of the definition of the preferred pack.
Could this ever be fooled if we had a preferred pack with 0 objects in
it? I don't know why we would have such a thing, but just trying to
think of cases where our assumptions might not hold (and what bad things
could happen).
> + if (bitmap_is_midx(bitmap_git))
> + pack = bitmap_git->midx->packs[midx_preferred_pack(bitmap_git)];
> + else
> + pack = bitmap_git->pack;
> + objects_nr = pack->num_objects;
> +
> while (i < result->word_alloc && result->words[i] == (eword_t)~0)
> i++;
>
> - /* Don't mark objects not in the packfile */
> + /*
> + * Don't mark objects not in the packfile or preferred pack. This bitmap
> + * marks objects eligible for reuse, but the pack-reuse code only
> + * understands how to reuse a single pack. Since the preferred pack is
> + * guaranteed to have all bases for its deltas (in a multi-pack bitmap),
> + * we use it instead of another pack. In single-pack bitmaps, the choice
> + * is made for us.
> + */
> if (i > objects_nr / BITS_IN_EWORD)
> i = objects_nr / BITS_IN_EWORD;
OK, so this clamps our "quick" contiguous set of bits to the number of
objects in the preferred pack. Makes sense. And then we hit the
object-by-object loop below...
> @@ -1213,7 +1437,15 @@ int reuse_partial_packfile_from_bitmap(struct bitmap_index *bitmap_git,
> break;
>
> offset += ewah_bit_ctz64(word >> offset);
> - try_partial_reuse(bitmap_git, pos + offset, reuse, &w_curs);
> + if (bitmap_is_midx(bitmap_git)) {
> + /*
> + * Can't reuse from a non-preferred pack (see
> + * above).
> + */
> + if (pos + offset >= objects_nr)
> + continue;
> + }
> + try_partial_reuse(bitmap_git, pack, pos + offset, reuse, &w_curs);
...and this likewise makes sure we never go past that first pack. Good.
I think this "continue" could actually be a "break", as the loop is
iterating over "offset" (and "pos + offset" always gets larger). In
fact, it could break out of the outer loop as well (which is
incrementing "pos"). It's probably a pretty small efficiency in
practice, though.
> @@ -1511,8 +1749,13 @@ uint32_t *create_bitmap_mapping(struct bitmap_index *bitmap_git,
> struct object_id oid;
> struct object_entry *oe;
>
> - nth_packed_object_id(&oid, bitmap_git->pack,
> - pack_pos_to_index(bitmap_git->pack, i));
> + if (bitmap_is_midx(bitmap_git))
> + nth_midxed_object_oid(&oid,
> + bitmap_git->midx,
> + pack_pos_to_midx(bitmap_git->midx, i));
> + else
> + nth_packed_object_id(&oid, bitmap_git->pack,
> + pack_pos_to_index(bitmap_git->pack, i));
> oe = packlist_find(mapping, &oid);
Could this be using nth_bitmap_object_oid()? I guess not, because we are
feeding from pack_pos_to_*. I'm not sure if another helper function is
worth it (pack_pos_to_bitmap_index() or something?).
> @@ -1575,7 +1831,31 @@ static off_t get_disk_usage_for_type(struct bitmap_index *bitmap_git,
> break;
>
> offset += ewah_bit_ctz64(word >> offset);
> - pos = base + offset;
> +
> + if (bitmap_is_midx(bitmap_git)) {
> + uint32_t pack_pos;
> + uint32_t midx_pos = pack_pos_to_midx(bitmap_git->midx, base + offset);
> + uint32_t pack_id = nth_midxed_pack_int_id(bitmap_git->midx, midx_pos);
> + off_t offset = nth_midxed_offset(bitmap_git->midx, midx_pos);
> +
> + pack = bitmap_git->midx->packs[pack_id];
> +
> + if (offset_to_pack_pos(pack, offset, &pack_pos) < 0) {
> + struct object_id oid;
> + nth_midxed_object_oid(&oid, bitmap_git->midx, midx_pos);
> +
> + die(_("could not find %s in pack #%"PRIu32" at offset %"PRIuMAX),
> + oid_to_hex(&oid),
> + pack_id,
> + (uintmax_t)offset);
> + }
> +
> + pos = pack_pos;
> + } else {
> + pack = bitmap_git->pack;
> + pos = base + offset;
> + }
> +
> total += pack_pos_to_offset(pack, pos + 1) -
> pack_pos_to_offset(pack, pos);
> }
In the midx case, we have to go from midx-bitmap-pos to midx-index-pos,
to then get the pack/ofs combo, which then gives us a real "pos" in the
pack. I don't think there's a faster way to do it (and this is still
much faster than looking up objects in the pack only to check their
revindex).
But then with the result, we compare the offset of "pos" and "pos + 1".
We need to know "pos" to find "pos + 1". But in the midx case, don't we
already have the offset of "pos" (it is "offset" in the bitmap_is_midx()
conditional, which is shadowing the completely unrelated "offset" in the
outer loop).
We could reuse it, saving ourselves an extra round-trip of pack_pos to
index_pos to offset. It would just mean stuffing the "total +=" line
into the two sides of the conditional.
> +off_t bitmap_pack_offset(struct bitmap_index *bitmap_git, uint32_t pos)
> +{
> + if (bitmap_is_midx(bitmap_git))
> + return nth_midxed_offset(bitmap_git->midx,
> + pack_pos_to_midx(bitmap_git->midx, pos));
> + return nth_packed_object_offset(bitmap_git->pack,
> + pack_pos_to_index(bitmap_git->pack, pos));
> +}
Does anybody call this function? I don't see any users by the end of the
series.
-Peff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-21 11:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 273+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-09 18:10 [PATCH 00/22] multi-pack reachability bitmaps Taylor Blau
2021-04-09 18:10 ` [PATCH 01/22] pack-bitmap.c: harden 'test_bitmap_walk()' to check type bitmaps Taylor Blau
2021-04-09 18:10 ` [PATCH 02/22] pack-bitmap-write.c: gracefully fail to write non-closed bitmaps Taylor Blau
2021-04-16 2:46 ` Jonathan Tan
2021-04-09 18:10 ` [PATCH 03/22] pack-bitmap-write.c: free existing bitmaps Taylor Blau
2021-04-09 18:10 ` [PATCH 04/22] Documentation: build 'technical/bitmap-format' by default Taylor Blau
2021-04-09 18:11 ` [PATCH 05/22] Documentation: describe MIDX-based bitmaps Taylor Blau
2021-04-09 18:11 ` [PATCH 06/22] midx: make a number of functions non-static Taylor Blau
2021-04-09 18:11 ` [PATCH 07/22] midx: clear auxiliary .rev after replacing the MIDX Taylor Blau
2021-04-09 18:11 ` [PATCH 08/22] midx: respect 'core.multiPackIndex' when writing Taylor Blau
2021-04-09 18:11 ` [PATCH 09/22] pack-bitmap.c: introduce 'bitmap_num_objects()' Taylor Blau
2021-04-09 18:11 ` [PATCH 10/22] pack-bitmap.c: introduce 'nth_bitmap_object_oid()' Taylor Blau
2021-04-09 18:11 ` [PATCH 11/22] pack-bitmap.c: introduce 'bitmap_is_preferred_refname()' Taylor Blau
2021-04-09 18:11 ` [PATCH 12/22] pack-bitmap: read multi-pack bitmaps Taylor Blau
2021-04-16 2:39 ` Jonathan Tan
2021-04-16 3:13 ` Taylor Blau
2021-04-09 18:11 ` [PATCH 13/22] pack-bitmap: write " Taylor Blau
2021-05-04 5:02 ` Jonathan Tan
2021-05-06 20:18 ` Taylor Blau
2021-05-06 22:00 ` Jonathan Tan
2021-04-09 18:11 ` [PATCH 14/22] t5310: move some tests to lib-bitmap.sh Taylor Blau
2021-04-09 18:11 ` [PATCH 15/22] t/helper/test-read-midx.c: add --checksum mode Taylor Blau
2021-04-09 18:12 ` [PATCH 16/22] t5326: test multi-pack bitmap behavior Taylor Blau
2021-05-04 17:51 ` Jonathan Tan
2021-04-09 18:12 ` [PATCH 17/22] t5310: disable GIT_TEST_MULTI_PACK_INDEX_WRITE_BITMAP Taylor Blau
2021-04-09 18:12 ` [PATCH 18/22] t5319: don't write MIDX bitmaps in t5319 Taylor Blau
2021-04-09 18:12 ` [PATCH 19/22] t7700: update to work with MIDX bitmap test knob Taylor Blau
2021-04-09 18:12 ` [PATCH 20/22] midx: respect 'GIT_TEST_MULTI_PACK_INDEX_WRITE_BITMAP' Taylor Blau
2021-04-09 18:12 ` [PATCH 21/22] p5310: extract full and partial bitmap tests Taylor Blau
2021-04-09 18:12 ` [PATCH 22/22] p5326: perf tests for MIDX bitmaps Taylor Blau
2021-05-04 18:00 ` Jonathan Tan
2021-05-05 0:55 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-06-21 22:24 ` [PATCH v2 00/24] multi-pack reachability bitmaps Taylor Blau
2021-06-21 22:24 ` [PATCH v2 01/24] pack-bitmap.c: harden 'test_bitmap_walk()' to check type bitmaps Taylor Blau
2021-06-24 23:02 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-07-14 17:24 ` Taylor Blau
2021-07-21 9:45 ` Jeff King
2021-07-21 17:15 ` Taylor Blau
2021-06-21 22:25 ` [PATCH v2 02/24] pack-bitmap-write.c: gracefully fail to write non-closed bitmaps Taylor Blau
2021-06-24 23:23 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-07-14 17:32 ` Taylor Blau
2021-07-14 18:44 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-07-21 9:53 ` Jeff King
2021-07-21 9:50 ` Jeff King
2021-07-21 17:20 ` Taylor Blau
2021-07-23 7:37 ` Jeff King
2021-07-26 18:48 ` Taylor Blau
2021-07-27 17:11 ` Jeff King
2021-06-21 22:25 ` [PATCH v2 03/24] pack-bitmap-write.c: free existing bitmaps Taylor Blau
2021-07-21 9:54 ` Jeff King
2021-06-21 22:25 ` [PATCH v2 04/24] Documentation: build 'technical/bitmap-format' by default Taylor Blau
2021-06-24 23:35 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-07-14 17:41 ` Taylor Blau
2021-07-14 22:58 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-07-21 10:04 ` Jeff King
2021-07-21 10:10 ` Jeff King
2021-07-21 9:58 ` Jeff King
2021-07-21 10:08 ` Jeff King
2021-07-21 17:23 ` Taylor Blau
2021-07-23 7:39 ` Jeff King
2021-07-26 18:49 ` Taylor Blau
2021-06-21 22:25 ` [PATCH v2 05/24] Documentation: describe MIDX-based bitmaps Taylor Blau
2021-07-21 10:18 ` Jeff King
2021-07-21 17:53 ` Taylor Blau
2021-07-23 7:45 ` Jeff King
2021-06-21 22:25 ` [PATCH v2 06/24] midx: make a number of functions non-static Taylor Blau
2021-06-24 23:42 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-07-14 23:01 ` Taylor Blau
2021-06-21 22:25 ` [PATCH v2 07/24] midx: clear auxiliary .rev after replacing the MIDX Taylor Blau
2021-07-21 10:19 ` Jeff King
2021-06-21 22:25 ` [PATCH v2 08/24] midx: respect 'core.multiPackIndex' when writing Taylor Blau
2021-06-24 23:43 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-07-21 10:23 ` Jeff King
2021-07-21 19:22 ` Taylor Blau
2021-07-23 8:29 ` Jeff King
2021-07-26 18:59 ` Taylor Blau
2021-07-26 22:14 ` Taylor Blau
2021-07-27 17:29 ` Jeff King
2021-07-27 17:36 ` Taylor Blau
2021-07-27 17:42 ` Jeff King
2021-07-27 17:47 ` Taylor Blau
2021-07-27 17:55 ` Jeff King
2021-07-27 20:05 ` Taylor Blau
2021-07-28 17:46 ` Jeff King
2021-07-29 19:44 ` Taylor Blau
2021-08-12 19:59 ` Jeff King
2021-07-27 17:17 ` Jeff King
2021-06-21 22:25 ` [PATCH v2 09/24] midx: infer preferred pack when not given one Taylor Blau
2021-07-21 10:34 ` Jeff King
2021-07-21 20:16 ` Taylor Blau
2021-07-23 8:50 ` Jeff King
2021-07-26 19:44 ` Taylor Blau
2021-06-21 22:25 ` [PATCH v2 10/24] pack-bitmap.c: introduce 'bitmap_num_objects()' Taylor Blau
2021-07-21 10:35 ` Jeff King
2021-06-21 22:25 ` [PATCH v2 11/24] pack-bitmap.c: introduce 'nth_bitmap_object_oid()' Taylor Blau
2021-06-24 14:59 ` Taylor Blau
2021-07-21 10:37 ` Jeff King
2021-07-21 10:38 ` Jeff King
2021-06-21 22:25 ` [PATCH v2 12/24] pack-bitmap.c: introduce 'bitmap_is_preferred_refname()' Taylor Blau
2021-07-21 10:39 ` Jeff King
2021-07-21 20:18 ` Taylor Blau
2021-06-21 22:25 ` [PATCH v2 13/24] pack-bitmap: read multi-pack bitmaps Taylor Blau
2021-07-21 11:32 ` Jeff King [this message]
2021-07-21 23:01 ` Taylor Blau
2021-07-23 9:40 ` Jeff King
2021-07-23 10:00 ` Jeff King
2021-07-26 20:36 ` Taylor Blau
2021-06-21 22:25 ` [PATCH v2 14/24] pack-bitmap: write " Taylor Blau
2021-06-24 23:45 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-07-15 14:33 ` Taylor Blau
2021-07-21 12:09 ` Jeff King
2021-07-26 18:12 ` Taylor Blau
2021-07-26 18:23 ` Taylor Blau
2021-07-27 17:11 ` Jeff King
2021-07-27 20:33 ` Taylor Blau
2021-07-28 17:52 ` Jeff King
2021-07-29 19:33 ` Taylor Blau
2021-08-12 20:00 ` Jeff King
2021-06-21 22:25 ` [PATCH v2 15/24] t5310: move some tests to lib-bitmap.sh Taylor Blau
2021-06-21 22:25 ` [PATCH v2 16/24] t/helper/test-read-midx.c: add --checksum mode Taylor Blau
2021-06-21 22:25 ` [PATCH v2 17/24] t5326: test multi-pack bitmap behavior Taylor Blau
2021-06-21 22:25 ` [PATCH v2 18/24] t0410: disable GIT_TEST_MULTI_PACK_INDEX_WRITE_BITMAP Taylor Blau
2021-06-21 22:25 ` [PATCH v2 19/24] t5310: " Taylor Blau
2021-06-21 22:25 ` [PATCH v2 20/24] t5319: don't write MIDX bitmaps in t5319 Taylor Blau
2021-06-21 22:25 ` [PATCH v2 21/24] t7700: update to work with MIDX bitmap test knob Taylor Blau
2021-06-21 22:25 ` [PATCH v2 22/24] midx: respect 'GIT_TEST_MULTI_PACK_INDEX_WRITE_BITMAP' Taylor Blau
2021-06-25 0:03 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-06-21 22:25 ` [PATCH v2 23/24] p5310: extract full and partial bitmap tests Taylor Blau
2021-06-21 22:26 ` [PATCH v2 24/24] p5326: perf tests for MIDX bitmaps Taylor Blau
2021-06-25 9:06 ` [PATCH v2 00/24] multi-pack reachability bitmaps Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-07-15 14:36 ` Taylor Blau
2021-07-21 12:12 ` Jeff King
2021-07-27 21:19 ` [PATCH v3 00/25] " Taylor Blau
2021-07-27 21:19 ` [PATCH v3 01/25] pack-bitmap.c: harden 'test_bitmap_walk()' to check type bitmaps Taylor Blau
2021-07-27 21:19 ` [PATCH v3 02/25] pack-bitmap-write.c: gracefully fail to write non-closed bitmaps Taylor Blau
2021-07-27 21:19 ` [PATCH v3 03/25] pack-bitmap-write.c: free existing bitmaps Taylor Blau
2021-07-27 21:19 ` [PATCH v3 04/25] Documentation: describe MIDX-based bitmaps Taylor Blau
2021-07-27 21:19 ` [PATCH v3 05/25] midx: clear auxiliary .rev after replacing the MIDX Taylor Blau
2021-07-27 21:19 ` [PATCH v3 06/25] midx: reject empty `--preferred-pack`'s Taylor Blau
2021-07-27 21:19 ` [PATCH v3 07/25] midx: infer preferred pack when not given one Taylor Blau
2021-07-27 21:19 ` [PATCH v3 08/25] midx: close linked MIDXs, avoid leaking memory Taylor Blau
2021-07-27 21:19 ` [PATCH v3 09/25] midx: avoid opening multiple MIDXs when writing Taylor Blau
2021-07-29 19:30 ` Taylor Blau
2021-08-12 20:15 ` Jeff King
2021-08-12 20:22 ` Jeff King
2021-08-12 21:20 ` Taylor Blau
2021-07-27 21:19 ` [PATCH v3 10/25] pack-bitmap.c: introduce 'bitmap_num_objects()' Taylor Blau
2021-07-27 21:19 ` [PATCH v3 11/25] pack-bitmap.c: introduce 'nth_bitmap_object_oid()' Taylor Blau
2021-07-27 21:19 ` [PATCH v3 12/25] pack-bitmap.c: introduce 'bitmap_is_preferred_refname()' Taylor Blau
2021-07-27 21:19 ` [PATCH v3 13/25] pack-bitmap.c: avoid redundant calls to try_partial_reuse Taylor Blau
2021-07-27 21:19 ` [PATCH v3 14/25] pack-bitmap: read multi-pack bitmaps Taylor Blau
2021-07-27 21:20 ` [PATCH v3 15/25] pack-bitmap: write " Taylor Blau
2021-07-27 21:20 ` [PATCH v3 16/25] t5310: move some tests to lib-bitmap.sh Taylor Blau
2021-08-12 20:25 ` Jeff King
2021-07-27 21:20 ` [PATCH v3 17/25] t/helper/test-read-midx.c: add --checksum mode Taylor Blau
2021-08-12 20:31 ` Jeff King
2021-08-12 21:31 ` Taylor Blau
2021-07-27 21:20 ` [PATCH v3 18/25] t5326: test multi-pack bitmap behavior Taylor Blau
2021-08-12 21:02 ` Jeff King
2021-08-12 21:07 ` Jeff King
2021-08-12 22:38 ` Taylor Blau
2021-08-12 23:23 ` Jeff King
2021-07-27 21:20 ` [PATCH v3 19/25] t0410: disable GIT_TEST_MULTI_PACK_INDEX_WRITE_BITMAP Taylor Blau
2021-07-27 21:20 ` [PATCH v3 20/25] t5310: " Taylor Blau
2021-07-27 21:20 ` [PATCH v3 21/25] t5319: don't write MIDX bitmaps in t5319 Taylor Blau
2021-07-27 21:20 ` [PATCH v3 22/25] t7700: update to work with MIDX bitmap test knob Taylor Blau
2021-07-27 21:20 ` [PATCH v3 23/25] midx: respect 'GIT_TEST_MULTI_PACK_INDEX_WRITE_BITMAP' Taylor Blau
2021-08-12 21:09 ` Jeff King
2021-07-27 21:20 ` [PATCH v3 24/25] p5310: extract full and partial bitmap tests Taylor Blau
2021-07-27 21:20 ` [PATCH v3 25/25] p5326: perf tests for MIDX bitmaps Taylor Blau
2021-08-12 21:18 ` Jeff King
2021-08-12 21:21 ` [PATCH v3 00/25] multi-pack reachability bitmaps Jeff King
2021-08-12 22:41 ` Taylor Blau
2021-08-24 16:15 ` [PATCH v4 " Taylor Blau
2021-08-24 16:15 ` [PATCH v4 01/25] pack-bitmap.c: harden 'test_bitmap_walk()' to check type bitmaps Taylor Blau
2021-08-24 16:15 ` [PATCH v4 02/25] pack-bitmap-write.c: gracefully fail to write non-closed bitmaps Taylor Blau
2021-08-24 16:15 ` [PATCH v4 03/25] pack-bitmap-write.c: free existing bitmaps Taylor Blau
2021-08-24 16:15 ` [PATCH v4 04/25] Documentation: describe MIDX-based bitmaps Taylor Blau
2021-08-24 16:16 ` [PATCH v4 05/25] midx: clear auxiliary .rev after replacing the MIDX Taylor Blau
2021-08-24 20:27 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-08-24 20:34 ` Taylor Blau
2021-08-24 21:12 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-08-24 21:24 ` Taylor Blau
2021-08-24 22:01 ` Taylor Blau
2021-08-24 22:04 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-08-24 22:06 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-08-24 22:10 ` Taylor Blau
2021-08-27 6:01 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-08-27 18:03 ` Taylor Blau
2021-08-29 22:56 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-08-30 0:07 ` Taylor Blau
2021-08-30 0:34 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-08-30 0:43 ` Taylor Blau
2021-08-30 22:10 ` brian m. carlson
2021-08-30 22:28 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-08-30 22:33 ` Taylor Blau
2021-08-31 5:19 ` Jeff King
2021-08-31 16:29 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-08-31 16:39 ` Taylor Blau
2021-08-31 17:44 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-08-31 18:48 ` Taylor Blau
2021-08-31 1:21 ` Derrick Stolee
2021-08-31 5:37 ` Jeff King
2021-08-31 16:33 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-08-31 16:43 ` Taylor Blau
2021-08-31 17:17 ` Derrick Stolee
2021-09-01 10:03 ` Jeff King
2021-08-24 16:16 ` [PATCH v4 06/25] midx: reject empty `--preferred-pack`'s Taylor Blau
2021-08-24 16:16 ` [PATCH v4 07/25] midx: infer preferred pack when not given one Taylor Blau
2021-08-24 16:16 ` [PATCH v4 08/25] midx: close linked MIDXs, avoid leaking memory Taylor Blau
2021-08-24 16:16 ` [PATCH v4 09/25] midx: avoid opening multiple MIDXs when writing Taylor Blau
2021-08-24 16:16 ` [PATCH v4 10/25] pack-bitmap.c: introduce 'bitmap_num_objects()' Taylor Blau
2021-08-24 16:16 ` [PATCH v4 11/25] pack-bitmap.c: introduce 'nth_bitmap_object_oid()' Taylor Blau
2021-08-24 16:16 ` [PATCH v4 12/25] pack-bitmap.c: introduce 'bitmap_is_preferred_refname()' Taylor Blau
2021-08-24 16:16 ` [PATCH v4 13/25] pack-bitmap.c: avoid redundant calls to try_partial_reuse Taylor Blau
2021-08-24 16:16 ` [PATCH v4 14/25] pack-bitmap: read multi-pack bitmaps Taylor Blau
2021-08-24 16:16 ` [PATCH v4 15/25] pack-bitmap: write " Taylor Blau
2021-08-24 16:16 ` [PATCH v4 16/25] t5310: move some tests to lib-bitmap.sh Taylor Blau
2021-08-24 16:16 ` [PATCH v4 17/25] t/helper/test-read-midx.c: add --checksum mode Taylor Blau
2021-08-24 16:16 ` [PATCH v4 18/25] t5326: test multi-pack bitmap behavior Taylor Blau
2021-08-24 16:16 ` [PATCH v4 19/25] t0410: disable GIT_TEST_MULTI_PACK_INDEX_WRITE_BITMAP Taylor Blau
2021-08-24 16:16 ` [PATCH v4 20/25] t5310: " Taylor Blau
2021-08-24 16:16 ` [PATCH v4 21/25] t5319: don't write MIDX bitmaps in t5319 Taylor Blau
2021-08-24 16:16 ` [PATCH v4 22/25] t7700: update to work with MIDX bitmap test knob Taylor Blau
2021-08-24 16:16 ` [PATCH v4 23/25] midx: respect 'GIT_TEST_MULTI_PACK_INDEX_WRITE_BITMAP' Taylor Blau
2021-08-24 16:16 ` [PATCH v4 24/25] p5310: extract full and partial bitmap tests Taylor Blau
2021-08-24 16:16 ` [PATCH v4 25/25] p5326: perf tests for MIDX bitmaps Taylor Blau
2021-08-25 0:28 ` [PATCH v4 00/25] multi-pack reachability bitmaps Jeff King
2021-08-25 2:10 ` Taylor Blau
2021-08-25 2:13 ` Taylor Blau
2021-08-25 7:36 ` Jeff King
2021-08-25 7:48 ` Johannes Berg
2021-08-26 18:49 ` Taylor Blau
2021-08-26 21:22 ` Taylor Blau
2021-08-27 21:30 ` Jeff King
2021-08-29 22:42 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-08-31 20:51 ` [PATCH v5 00/27] " Taylor Blau
2021-08-31 20:51 ` [PATCH v5 01/27] pack-bitmap.c: harden 'test_bitmap_walk()' to check type bitmaps Taylor Blau
2021-08-31 20:51 ` [PATCH v5 02/27] pack-bitmap-write.c: gracefully fail to write non-closed bitmaps Taylor Blau
2021-08-31 20:51 ` [PATCH v5 03/27] pack-bitmap-write.c: free existing bitmaps Taylor Blau
2021-08-31 20:51 ` [PATCH v5 04/27] Documentation: describe MIDX-based bitmaps Taylor Blau
2021-08-31 20:51 ` [PATCH v5 05/27] midx: disallow running outside of a repository Taylor Blau
2021-08-31 20:51 ` [PATCH v5 06/27] midx: fix `*.rev` cleanups with `--object-dir` Taylor Blau
2021-08-31 20:51 ` [PATCH v5 07/27] midx: clear auxiliary .rev after replacing the MIDX Taylor Blau
2021-08-31 20:52 ` [PATCH v5 08/27] midx: reject empty `--preferred-pack`'s Taylor Blau
2021-08-31 20:52 ` [PATCH v5 09/27] midx: infer preferred pack when not given one Taylor Blau
2021-08-31 20:52 ` [PATCH v5 10/27] midx: close linked MIDXs, avoid leaking memory Taylor Blau
2021-08-31 20:52 ` [PATCH v5 11/27] midx: avoid opening multiple MIDXs when writing Taylor Blau
2021-08-31 20:52 ` [PATCH v5 12/27] pack-bitmap.c: introduce 'bitmap_num_objects()' Taylor Blau
2021-08-31 20:52 ` [PATCH v5 13/27] pack-bitmap.c: introduce 'nth_bitmap_object_oid()' Taylor Blau
2021-08-31 20:52 ` [PATCH v5 14/27] pack-bitmap.c: introduce 'bitmap_is_preferred_refname()' Taylor Blau
2021-08-31 20:52 ` [PATCH v5 15/27] pack-bitmap.c: avoid redundant calls to try_partial_reuse Taylor Blau
2021-08-31 20:52 ` [PATCH v5 16/27] pack-bitmap: read multi-pack bitmaps Taylor Blau
2021-08-31 20:52 ` [PATCH v5 17/27] pack-bitmap: write " Taylor Blau
2021-08-31 20:52 ` [PATCH v5 18/27] t5310: move some tests to lib-bitmap.sh Taylor Blau
2021-08-31 20:52 ` [PATCH v5 19/27] t/helper/test-read-midx.c: add --checksum mode Taylor Blau
2021-08-31 20:52 ` [PATCH v5 20/27] t5326: test multi-pack bitmap behavior Taylor Blau
2021-08-31 20:52 ` [PATCH v5 21/27] t0410: disable GIT_TEST_MULTI_PACK_INDEX_WRITE_BITMAP Taylor Blau
2021-08-31 20:52 ` [PATCH v5 22/27] t5310: " Taylor Blau
2021-08-31 20:52 ` [PATCH v5 23/27] t5319: don't write MIDX bitmaps in t5319 Taylor Blau
2021-08-31 20:52 ` [PATCH v5 24/27] t7700: update to work with MIDX bitmap test knob Taylor Blau
2021-08-31 20:52 ` [PATCH v5 25/27] midx: respect 'GIT_TEST_MULTI_PACK_INDEX_WRITE_BITMAP' Taylor Blau
2021-08-31 20:52 ` [PATCH v5 26/27] p5310: extract full and partial bitmap tests Taylor Blau
2021-08-31 20:52 ` [PATCH v5 27/27] p5326: perf tests for MIDX bitmaps Taylor Blau
2021-09-01 18:07 ` [PATCH v5 00/27] multi-pack reachability bitmaps Junio C Hamano
2021-09-01 19:08 ` Taylor Blau
2021-09-01 19:23 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-09-01 20:34 ` Taylor Blau
2021-09-01 20:49 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-09-01 20:54 ` Taylor Blau
2021-09-02 9:40 ` Jeff King
2021-09-02 9:38 ` Jeff King
2021-09-02 9:45 ` Jeff King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YPgF4X2PeFvBuJXm@coredump.intra.peff.net \
--to=peff@peff.net \
--cc=dstolee@microsoft.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=jonathantanmy@google.com \
--cc=me@ttaylorr.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).