From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS53758 23.128.96.0/24 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54D961F8C6 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 18:49:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232041AbhGZSIj (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Jul 2021 14:08:39 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:34176 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231924AbhGZSIi (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Jul 2021 14:08:38 -0400 Received: from mail-io1-xd31.google.com (mail-io1-xd31.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d31]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F342AC061757 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 11:49:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-io1-xd31.google.com with SMTP id u15so13077475iol.13 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 11:49:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ttaylorr-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=fnWt2kdkaGvIVi85NrzlIhXltb/T+b7V8IgYUD/LZyk=; b=ZsEcWJDYbnSCql46Vj1A0CpKXB+4CZWlwuncNUo7wkbwqmLToFJ7fgrrfvxEw1qfF3 ffk+UeALj72+MAkzeJtES8Vn5bye5/iXj+Wu43E2V25Lgk5hsPfaFp0oIjSlBFeN2Qc2 GTMDY/JY0NtDbFlJ/tbhlTrK6LnetVwlBtvahxD3Fy6duPo4qjWG11WjXecVyI1lu48P ItZiyv/5n4xNyNGhonX0x7hvujW+FRi5ZVOuTHZtNQs487vto7i/BWOYFuypsw4Q3bnG UIJCK6FGvYYbr5P3eZy7jy20qU2YUd0Af/Zttr8TMNPxHheVNHoPUXJLPVSxtycajE3U pxZg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=fnWt2kdkaGvIVi85NrzlIhXltb/T+b7V8IgYUD/LZyk=; b=ECxTAehHLIW6o79NjJ4joK8JDdIYseHUy5QRxgbdjHY8HYfuhI0ylqrc4XrJFNEGZV kLPhLF1hwcBx4p6nURaJctUE73XAPPShZJQ+rcp9kEQ34LgbLAazwa9IWNKMmzcTyoSn 9fRyEWs61DQl+XwnzsiRziojQvhVfkg1G726YQMaceVBEyNpOVBIEP2k8dbsw/42PB8v 868XIf8uPRMBPOlrOPmayk1BtYGPq+UE038esGn6jP3wE4AKukUSkLRgtw0bRrrPRZ+o wA6ctv1XzxtzZJrLytI6F1A9zJ7gUKc63HvxUuIyEtCYu1DEdo09601GjvEp9l5yAQjp L7Mg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530uyvUlh9oUsPrrzX+Uvg1G0R1WPD3h9bWqY2avzDpzNe3bKQLb usCzfBHcDUjHjfmv8GqwonHkQg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz/vSsQunReibK3f2RcMitzJaia5RRsgDVclfjTB2ThW5fe1P7QuQmyv+Vz3u5tgcHzvKmR6g== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6602:248f:: with SMTP id g15mr1583036ioe.198.1627325345529; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 11:49:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2600:1700:d843:8f:18ae:76f8:f6b8:4b88]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b9sm309902ilf.16.2021.07.26.11.49.04 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 26 Jul 2021 11:49:05 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 14:49:04 -0400 From: Taylor Blau To: Jeff King Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, dstolee@microsoft.com, gitster@pobox.com, jonathantanmy@google.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/24] Documentation: build 'technical/bitmap-format' by default Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 03:39:25AM -0400, Jeff King wrote: > The question here is: should we continue to omit it from the html build, > since it does not render well (i.e., should we simply drop this patch). I think that's a nice way of putting it. Since the HTML rendering is terrible, let's just drop this patch and leave cleaning it up as #leftoverbits. Thanks, Taylor