From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS53758 23.128.96.0/24 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8E651F8C6 for ; Mon, 12 Jul 2021 21:41:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234870AbhGLVob (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jul 2021 17:44:31 -0400 Received: from cloud.peff.net ([104.130.231.41]:47136 "EHLO cloud.peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229842AbhGLVo2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jul 2021 17:44:28 -0400 Received: (qmail 23103 invoked by uid 109); 12 Jul 2021 21:41:39 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO peff.net) (10.0.1.2) by cloud.peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.94) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Jul 2021 21:41:39 +0000 Authentication-Results: cloud.peff.net; auth=none Received: (qmail 2843 invoked by uid 111); 12 Jul 2021 21:41:40 -0000 Received: from coredump.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.2) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.94) with (TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 12 Jul 2021 17:41:40 -0400 Authentication-Results: peff.net; auth=none Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2021 17:41:38 -0400 From: Jeff King To: Elijah Newren Cc: Git Mailing List , Derrick Stolee , Junio C Hamano , Linus Torvalds , Jonathan Tan , =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason Subject: Re: [RFC] Bump {diff,merge}.renameLimit ? Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 01:23:38PM -0700, Elijah Newren wrote: > > > * The feedback about the limit is better today than when we last changed > > > the limits, and folks can configure a higher limit relatively easily. > > > Many already have. > > > > I can't remember the last time I saw the limit kick in in practice, but > > then I don't generally work with super-large repos (and my workflows > > typically do not encourage merging across big segments of history). > > Nor do I remember the topic coming up on the list after the last bump. > > So maybe that means that people are happily bumping the limits > > themselves via config. > > It might also mean that you're missing more emails than you used to, > or just forgot them. :-) > > e.g.: > https://lore.kernel.org/git/20171129201154.192379-1-jonathantanmy@google.com/ > https://lore.kernel.org/git/20171113201600.24878-1-newren@gmail.com/ > > But I do certainly suspect it's come up less often than it would have before. Oh, indeed. Thanks for some counterexamples. :) -Peff