git@vger.kernel.org list mirror (unofficial, one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Cc: "Junio C Hamano" <gitster@pobox.com>,
	"Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <avarab@gmail.com>,
	git@vger.kernel.org, "Denton Liu" <liu.denton@gmail.com>,
	"Jeff Hostetler" <jeffhost@microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] trace2: refactor to avoid gcc warning under -O3
Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 14:00:26 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YJrGOqjS10Z/WkE8@coredump.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.2105111632380.57@tvgsbejvaqbjf.bet>

On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 04:34:49PM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote:

> On Fri, 7 May 2021, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> 
> > Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:
> >
> > >> Otherwise I'd strongly prefer to see a word that hints that this is
> > >> an otherwise unneeded workaround for comiplers.  Your suggested
> > >> title instead hints that it is wrong to assume that errno will be
> > >> set to non-zero after a syscall.  I do not think that is the message
> > >> we want to send to our readers.
> > >
> > > Right, the oneline I suggested was only for the original patch, with which
> > > I disagreed.
> >
> > I actually do not know how your rewrite could be better, though.
> >
> > 		/* GCC thinks socket()/connect() might fail to set errno */
> > 		return errno ? errno : EIO;
> >
> > If a compiler thinks errno may *not* be set, can 'errno' be reliably
> > used to decide if it can be returned as-is or a fallback value EIO
> > should be used, without triggering the same (incorrect) working in
> > the first place?
> 
> Oh, I guess I mistook the problem for something else, then.
> 
> If the problem is that `errno` is not set in case of failure, the
> resolution is easy (and even recommended in the manual page of `errno`):
> simply set it to 0 before the syscall (or in the function that relies on
> `errno == 0` means success).

I don't think that is the problem. According to the standard, errno is
always set to a non-zero value after a syscall failure.

The problem is only that the compiler does not incorporate that special
knowledge of the variable, so it generates a warning even though we can
reason that the situation it describes is impossible.

-Peff

  reply	other threads:[~2021-05-11 18:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-01  7:30 [PATCH] Fix -Wmaybe-uninitialized warnings under -O0 Denton Liu
     [not found] ` <CAPUEspgBkmxszgBee8C9hZnEwqztf-XKEj7LB_jWVFJaJCge0w@mail.gmail.com>
2020-04-01  9:05   ` Denton Liu
2020-04-01  9:52 ` Jeff King
2020-04-01 14:06   ` Denton Liu
2020-04-03 14:04     ` Jeff King
2020-04-03 14:38       ` Jeff King
2020-04-04 12:07       ` Denton Liu
2020-04-04 14:21         ` Jeff King
2021-05-05  8:40           ` [PATCH] trace2: refactor to avoid gcc warning under -O3 Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-05-05  9:47             ` Junio C Hamano
2021-05-05 13:34               ` Jeff King
2021-05-05 14:38             ` Johannes Schindelin
2021-05-06  1:26               ` Junio C Hamano
2021-05-06 20:29                 ` Johannes Schindelin
2021-05-06 21:10                   ` Junio C Hamano
2021-05-11 14:34                     ` Johannes Schindelin
2021-05-11 18:00                       ` Jeff King [this message]
2021-05-11 20:58                         ` Junio C Hamano
2021-05-11 21:07                           ` Jeff King
2021-05-11 21:33                             ` Junio C Hamano
2021-05-11  7:03             ` Junio C Hamano
2021-05-11 13:04             ` [PATCH v2] " Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-05-11 16:40               ` Jeff Hostetler
2021-05-11 17:54               ` Jeff King
2021-05-11 18:08                 ` Jeff King
2021-05-11 21:09                   ` Junio C Hamano
2021-05-20  0:20                   ` Junio C Hamano
2021-05-20 11:05                     ` [PATCH v3] " Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-05-20 13:13                       ` Jeff King
2021-05-20 22:08                         ` Junio C Hamano
2021-05-21  9:34                           ` Jeff King

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YJrGOqjS10Z/WkE8@coredump.intra.peff.net \
    --to=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
    --cc=avarab@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=jeffhost@microsoft.com \
    --cc=liu.denton@gmail.com \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH] trace2: refactor to avoid gcc warning under -O3' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Code repositories for project(s) associated with this inbox:

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).