From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS53758 23.128.96.0/24 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90CCC1F5AE for ; Thu, 6 May 2021 16:21:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235817AbhEFQWD (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 May 2021 12:22:03 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:44534 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235246AbhEFQWC (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 May 2021 12:22:02 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-x535.google.com (mail-pg1-x535.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::535]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED70DC061574 for ; Thu, 6 May 2021 09:21:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pg1-x535.google.com with SMTP id s22so5063645pgk.6 for ; Thu, 06 May 2021 09:21:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=ueqISx5FbI1D+l9b7G3N0CURgIT5tLoh9eDWF4dKm4Q=; b=UWgxoc2MGsU2DA7QOPZdO9/vdd3mBS2Az8zExudYeox/zcIHOEdqgziUTJPuM8VkZR KdVsRicEbct6yE7kHqxY/bc2JX78OHUnQXEl+Tu/2MWCvZaNyAPcIZ4F/OXG2VDiyG6y JXzkM9vSX168o9OPm1Z7eAQO511O7mHmlrCpOKR6IOaKjOXpyi7p8zztQB1M+5GChMdD 78zTIdBx7cbWGJKWqt9bDffh/6Ib7HkdGWwf5PmMO0QL5Je1VCDrs8CJ+9Xjium4tc58 RcN9gcmR7pNg/4KE0aLWVVU4nRMwRwy6H9MPVbM+ZaaNHSYQZBIZogM+m1BAv3Svl2mx wFbw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to; bh=ueqISx5FbI1D+l9b7G3N0CURgIT5tLoh9eDWF4dKm4Q=; b=Jt+OhZK6J8qaIQSvfbmGl2VSj/0aecB1yT06PtpE35mi2fSKZl4fdB7GNpLZgI2ysk 5KEZ2uyRr9RKZw16KWd8gcprakoTfjuloeW1lH7JiSj2bkAKze0hEQeEXAwpt/TWKiqp m9VY0i1bIz1FPshXbSgCde/RwEus2v9GfQSyUF7PPB1CKMBaNAvO6d/1f6kOcbkuXrsB S84OTcKEq0a2QnWvgJBilueydNvb1nqmlCE/ow7czG82csxSt0+WMnotUJADovDNNNWc 2urLDnrJaHh+lYSBQhKzibQKj9SyIA5P5xtLk6k5NptK5Fwcs1XnUzMdxf40WqYZ/Vkw c6PQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532cVlMlET74Rk/iwxrk/f+ltWalbqDOs8UAXCifAbXiUIa4e2sW +aCjn0lRAPr+uuxQn1jhMAY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxbq+SrgePurSiw1mfbCjqb+zT8Re9Dmi5D5xWMBRxJXT3H95xzBK3bMm+dSV84QZ12OsidsQ== X-Received: by 2002:a62:cfc2:0:b029:28e:82bf:a174 with SMTP id b185-20020a62cfc20000b029028e82bfa174mr5811556pfg.9.1620318063402; Thu, 06 May 2021 09:21:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2402:800:63b8:d379:85bd:c83a:4b40:cd9b]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m4sm1099314pjo.53.2021.05.06.09.21.02 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 06 May 2021 09:21:03 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 6 May 2021 23:21:01 +0700 From: =?utf-8?B?xJBvw6BuIFRy4bqnbiBDw7RuZw==?= Danh To: =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Junio C Hamano , Jeff King , Matthieu Moy , Johannes Schindelin , Eric Sunshine , SZEDER =?utf-8?B?R8OhYm9y?= , Andreas Schwab Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/11] test-lib.sh: new test_commit args, simplification & fixes Message-ID: References: <87eeejvpuy.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <87eeejvpuy.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On 2021-05-06 17:32:01+0200, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 23 2021, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote: > > > Changes since v4: Only a commit message change/re-wording per > > <87v98e1oj7.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com>. > > SZEDER, Eric, Đoàn et al: does this v5 look good to you? Junio's > suggested in [1] that this needs some final review feedback before > advancing to 'next'. If you could take a look that would be great! I have some minor nit-picks here and there, I didn't look into 11/11. Otherwise, I think the series is fine, now. -- Danh